Umeå universitets logga

A regular unranked tree folding consists of a regular unranked tree language and a folding operation that merges (i.e., folds) selected nodes of a tree to form a graph; the combination is a formal device for representing graph languages. If, in the process of folding, the order among edges is discarded so that the result is an unordered graph, then two applications of a fold operation are enough to make the associated parsing problem NP-complete. However, if the order is kept, then the problem is solvable in non-uniform polynomial time. In this paper, we address the remaining case, where only one fold operation is applied, but the order among the edges is discarded. We show that, under these conditions, the problem is solvable in non-uniform polynomial time.

Order-preserving DAG grammars (OPDGs) is a formalism for representing languages of structurally restricted graphs. As demonstrated in [17], they are sufficiently expressive to model abstract meaning representations in natural language processing, a graph-based form of semantic representation in which nodes encode objects and edges relations. At the same time, they can be parsed in O (n² + nm) , where m and n are the sizes of the grammar and the input graph, respectively. In this work, we provide an initial algebra semantic for OPDGs, which allows us to view them as regular tree grammars under an equivalence theory. This makes it possible to transfer results from the field of formal tree languages to the domain of OPDGs, both in the unweighted and the weighted case. In particular, we show that deterministic OPDGs can be minimised efficiently, and that they are learnable under the \minimal adequeate teacher" paradigm, that is, by querying an oracle for equivalence between languages, and membership of individual graphs. To conclude, we demonstrate that the languages generated by OPDGs are definable in monadic second-order logic.

Despite concerns that Large Language Models (LLMs) are vectors for reproducing and ampli- fying social biases such as sexism, transpho- bia, islamophobia, and racism, there is a lack of work qualitatively analyzing how such pat- terns of bias are generated by LLMs. We use mixed-methods approaches and apply a femi- nist, intersectional lens to the problem across two language domains, Swedish and English, by generating narrative texts using LLMs. We find that hegemonic norms are consistently re- produced; dominant identities are often treated as ‘default’; and discussion of identity itself may be considered ‘inappropriate’ by the safety features applied to some LLMs. Due to the dif- fering behaviors of models, depending both on their design and the language they are trained on, we observe that strategies of identifying “bias” must be adapted to individual models and their socio-cultural contexts.

Part of Speech (POS) taggers for Swedish routinely fail for the third person gender-neutral pronoun hen, despite the fact that it has been a well-established part of the Swedish language since at least 2014. In addition to simply being a form of gender bias, this failure can have negative effects on other tasks relying on POS information. We demonstrate the usefulness of semi-synthetic augmented datasets in a case study, retraining a POS tagger to correctly recognize hen as a personal pronoun. We evaluate our retrained models for both tag accuracy and on a downstream task (dependency parsing) in a classicial NLP pipeline.

Our results show that adding such data works to correct for the disparity in performance. The accuracy rate for identifying hen as a pronoun can be brought up to acceptable levels with only minor adjustments to the tagger’s vocabulary files. Performance parity to gendered pronouns can be reached after retraining with only a few hundred examples. This increase in POS tag accuracy also results in improvements for dependency parsing sentences containing hen.

A regular unranked tree folding consists of a regular unranked tree language and a folding operation that merges, i.e., folds, selected nodes of a tree to form a graph; the combination is a formal device for representing graph languages. If, in the process of folding, the order among edges is discarded so that the result is an unordered graph, then two applications of a fold operation is enough to make the associated parsing problem NP-complete. However, if the order is kept, then the problem is solvable in non-uniform polynomial time. In this paper we address the remaining case where only one fold operation is applied, but the order among edges is discarded. We show that under these conditions, the problem is solvable in non-uniform polynomial time.

We introduce a fold operation that realises a tree-to-graph transduction by merging selected nodes in the input tree to form a possibly cyclic output graph. The work is motivated by the increasing use of graph-based representations in semantic parsing. We show that a suitable class of graphs languages can be generated by applying the fold operation to regular unranked tree languages. We investigate two versions of the fold operation, one that preserves a depth-first ordering between the edges, and one that does not. Finally, we demonstrate that the time complexity for the associated non-uniform membership problem is solvable in polynomial time for the order-preserving version, and NP-complete for the order-cancelling one.

Despite the fact that the gender-neutral pro-noun hen was officially added to the Swedish language in 2014, state of the art part of speech taggers still routinely fail to identify it as a pronoun. We retrain both efselab and spaCy models with augmented (semi-synthetic) data, where instances of gendered pronouns are replaced by hen to correct for the lack of representation in the original training data. Our results show that adding such data works to correct for the disparity in performance

The rise of concern around Natural Language Processing (NLP) technologies containing and perpetuating social biases has led to a rich and rapidly growing area of research. Gender bias is one of the central biases being analyzed, but to date there is no comprehensive analysis of how “gender” is theorized in the field. We survey nearly 200 articles concerning gender bias in NLP to discover how the field conceptualizes gender both explicitly (e.g. through definitions of terms) and implicitly (e.g. through how gender is operationalized in practice). In order to get a better idea of emerging trajectories of thought, we split these articles into two sections by time.

We find that the majority of the articles do not make their theo- rization of gender explicit, even if they clearly define “bias.” Almost none use a model of gender that is intersectional or inclusive of non- binary genders; and many conflate sex characteristics, social gender, and linguistic gender in ways that disregard the existence and expe- rience of trans, nonbinary, and intersex people. There is an increase between the two time-sections in statements acknowledging that gender is a complicated reality, however, very few articles manage to put this acknowledgment into practice. In addition to analyzing these findings, we provide specific recommendations to facilitate interdisciplinary work, and to incorporate theory and methodol- ogy from Gender Studies. Our hope is that this will produce more inclusive gender bias research in NLP.

It is well known that hyperedge-replacement grammars can generate NP-complete graph languages even under seemingly harsh restrictions. This means that the parsing problem is difficult even in the non-uniform setting, in which the grammar is considered to be fixed rather than being part of the input. Little is known about restrictions under which truly uniform polynomial parsing is possible. In this paper we propose a low-degree polynomial-time algorithm that solves the uniform parsing problem for a restricted type of hyperedge-replacement grammars which we expect to be of interest for practical applications.

Gender bias in natural language processing (NLP) tools, deriving from implicit human bias embedded in language data, is an important and complicated problem on the road to fair algorithms. We leverage topic modeling to retrieve documents associated with particular gendered categories, and discuss how exploring these documents can inform our understanding of the corpora we may use to train NLP tools. This is a starting point for challenging the systemic power structures and producing a justice-focused approach to NLP.