Open this publication in new window or tab >>RECETOX, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution and Health, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution and Health, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA), Oslo, Norway.
Kinneret Limnological Laboratory, Israel Oceanographic and Limnological Research, Migdal, Israel.
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Chemistry.
Marine Institute, Co. Galway, Rinville, Oranmore, Ireland.
National Antarctic Scientific Center, Kyiv, Ukraine.
School of Criminal Justice, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; Norwegian Geotechnical Institute (NGI), Oslo, Norway.
Instituto de Oceanografia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (IO-FURG), Campus Carreiros, RS, Rio Grande, Brazil.
Air Quality Processes Research Section, Environment and Climate Change Canada, ON, Egbert, Canada.
Queensland Alliance for Environmental Health Sciences, (QAEHS), The University of Queensl, QLD, Woolloongabba, Australia.
Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority, CA, Costa Mesa, United States.
Marine Institute, Co. Galway, Rinville, Oranmore, Ireland.
Coastal Systems Research Group, CSIR, Durban, South Africa; Nelson Mandela University, Port Elizabeth, South Africa.
Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research (IDAEA-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain.
Institute of Oceanography, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Heraklion, Greece.
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Chemistry.
Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research (IDAEA-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain.
Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority, CA, Costa Mesa, United States.
Show others...
2024 (English)In: Environmental Science and Technology, ISSN 0013-936X, E-ISSN 1520-5851, Vol. 58, no 30, p. 13456-13466Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), released from petrogenic, pyrogenic or diagenetic sources (degradation of wood materials), are of global concern due to their adverse effects, and potential for long-range transport. While dissolved PAHs have been frequently reported in the literature, there has been no consistent approach of sampling across water bodies. Passive samplers from the AQUA/GAPS-MONET initiative were deployed at 46 sites (28 marine and 18 freshwater), and analyzed for 28 PAHs and six polycyclic musks (PCMs) centrally. Freely dissolved PAH concentrations were dominated by phenanthrene (mean concentration 1500 pg L-1; median 530 pg L-1) and other low molecular weight compounds. Greatest concentrations of phenanthrene, fluoranthene, and pyrene were typically from the same sites, mostly in Europe and North America. Of the PCMs, only galaxolide (72% of samples) and tonalide (61%) were regularly detected, and were significantly cross-correlated. Benchmarking of PAHs relative to penta- and hexachlorobenzene confirmed that the most remote sites (Arctic, Antarctic, and mountain lakes) displayed below average PAH concentrations. Concentrations of 11 of 28 PAHs, galaxolide and tonalide were positively correlated (P < 0.05) with population density within a radius of 5 km of the sampling site. Characteristic PAH ratios gave conflicting results, likely reflecting multiple PAH sources and postemission changes.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
American Chemical Society (ACS), 2024
Keywords
global distribution, PAHs, passive samplers, polycyclic musks, surface water
National Category
Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-228121 (URN)10.1021/acs.est.4c03099 (DOI)001273632100001 ()39031616 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-85199413898 (Scopus ID)
Projects
EcoChange
Funder
Swedish Research Council Formas
2024-08-062024-08-062024-08-19Bibliographically approved