umu.sePublications
Change search
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
BETA
Derlén, Mattias
Alternative names
Publications (10 of 49) Show all publications
Derlén, M. (2019). Multilingualism and the dynamic interpretation of European Union law. In: Georges Abi-Saab, Kenneth Keith, Gabrielle Marceau & Clément Marquet (Ed.), Evolutionary interpretation and international law: (pp. 329-338). Oxford: Hart Publishing Ltd
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Multilingualism and the dynamic interpretation of European Union law
2019 (English)In: Evolutionary interpretation and international law / [ed] Georges Abi-Saab, Kenneth Keith, Gabrielle Marceau & Clément Marquet, Oxford: Hart Publishing Ltd, 2019, p. 329-338Chapter in book (Other academic)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford: Hart Publishing Ltd, 2019
Keywords
EU law, multilingualism, interpretation, evolutionary interpretation, dynamic interpretation, European Court of Justice
National Category
Law (excluding Law and Society)
Research subject
european law; jurisprudence
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-162167 (URN)9781509929887 (ISBN)9781509929894 (ISBN)
Available from: 2019-08-15 Created: 2019-08-15 Last updated: 2019-09-23Bibliographically approved
Derlén, M. & Lindholm, J. (2019). What happened to the revolution?: one decade with Trailers and MEQRs. In: Ruth Mannelqvist, Staffan Ingmanson, Carin Ulander-Wänman (Ed.), Festskrift till Örjan Edström: (pp. 91-108). Umeå: Department of Law, Umeå University
Open this publication in new window or tab >>What happened to the revolution?: one decade with Trailers and MEQRs
2019 (English)In: Festskrift till Örjan Edström / [ed] Ruth Mannelqvist, Staffan Ingmanson, Carin Ulander-Wänman, Umeå: Department of Law, Umeå University , 2019, p. 91-108Chapter in book (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

In 2009 the CJEU delivered its judgment in the so-called Trailers case, offering a new perspective on the enigmatic ban on measures having an equivalent effect to a quantitative restrictions (MEQRs). Trailers was a positive, even necessary, development in an area fraught with complications but it left many questions as to the future direction of the CJEU. One decade on, and after several notable judgments, we are now in a position to return to those questions. This contribution explores the impact of Trailers and the relevance today of seminal MEQR decisions like DassonvilleKeck and Cassis de Dijon.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå: Department of Law, Umeå University, 2019
Series
Skrifter från Juridiska institutionen vid Umeå universitet, ISSN 1404-9198 ; 41
Keywords
EU law, internal market, free movement of goods, measures equivalent to quantitative restrictions, MEQR
National Category
Law (excluding Law and Society)
Research subject
european law
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-160259 (URN)9789178550784 (ISBN)
Available from: 2019-06-17 Created: 2019-06-17 Last updated: 2019-07-01Bibliographically approved
Derlén, M., Lindholm, J. & Naurin, D. (2019). You’re Gonna Miss Me When I’m Gone!: The Impact of Brexit on Member States’ Contribution to the Case Law of the CJEU. Europarättslig tidskrift (3), 381-395
Open this publication in new window or tab >>You’re Gonna Miss Me When I’m Gone!: The Impact of Brexit on Member States’ Contribution to the Case Law of the CJEU
2019 (English)In: Europarättslig tidskrift, ISSN 1403-8722, no 3, p. 381-395Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Brexit is scheduled to happen on October 31, 2019, and researchers have previously studied the impact of Brexit on relationships in the EU’s political institutions. This paper studies how Brexit might affect Member States’ interactions with the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and, more specifically, when they seek to influence the Court by submitting observations. The Untied Kingdom has consistently been a comparatively active Member State, submitting many observations. The paper introduces and employs a novel approach, studying what we call "mentions" in CJEU decisions, to measure position similarity in Member States' observations and to identify the UK's "allies" before the CJEU. The paper concludes the loss of the UK will be felt in particular in Germany, the Netherlands, Ireland and in the Nordic countries. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Europarättslig Tidskrift, 2019
Keywords
EU law, CJEU, judicial politics, observations, position similarity
National Category
Law (excluding Law and Society) Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalisation Studies)
Research subject
european law; Law; political science
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-163563 (URN)
Available from: 2019-09-26 Created: 2019-09-26 Last updated: 2019-09-30Bibliographically approved
Derlén, M. (2018). Friederike Zedler, Mehrsprachigkeit und Methode. Der Umgang mit dem sprachlichen Egalitätsprinzip im Unionsrecht. [Review]. Common market law review, 55(3), 962-964
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Friederike Zedler, Mehrsprachigkeit und Methode. Der Umgang mit dem sprachlichen Egalitätsprinzip im Unionsrecht.
2018 (English)In: Common market law review, ISSN 0165-0750, E-ISSN 1875-8320, Vol. 55, no 3, p. 962-964Article, book review (Other academic) Published
Keywords
multilingualism, linguistic equality, European Court of Justice, reform
National Category
Law (excluding Law and Society)
Research subject
europarätt
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-148055 (URN)
Available from: 2018-05-25 Created: 2018-05-25 Last updated: 2018-06-09
Derlén, M. (2018). Multilingualism and the European Court of Justice: challenges, reforms and the position of English after Brexit. In: Emmanuel Guinchard, Marie-Pierre Granger (Ed.), The new EU judiciary: an analysis of current judicial reforms (pp. 341-356). Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Multilingualism and the European Court of Justice: challenges, reforms and the position of English after Brexit
2018 (English)In: The new EU judiciary: an analysis of current judicial reforms / [ed] Emmanuel Guinchard, Marie-Pierre Granger, Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2018, p. 341-356Chapter in book (Other academic)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2018
Series
European monographs series set ; 102
Keywords
European Court of Justice, Language Regime, Reforms, Multilingualism, Brexit, English
National Category
Law (excluding Law and Society)
Research subject
europarätt
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-143879 (URN)9789041168344 (ISBN)9789041168405 (ISBN)9789041189516 (ISBN)
Available from: 2018-01-12 Created: 2018-01-12 Last updated: 2019-01-16Bibliographically approved
Derlén, M. & Lindholm, J. (2018). Serving two masters: CJEU case law in Swedish first instance courts and national courts of precedent as gatekeepers. In: Mattias Derlén and Johan Lindholm (Ed.), The Court of Justice of the European Union: multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 79-99). Oxford: Hart Publishing Ltd
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Serving two masters: CJEU case law in Swedish first instance courts and national courts of precedent as gatekeepers
2018 (English)In: The Court of Justice of the European Union: multidisciplinary perspectives / [ed] Mattias Derlén and Johan Lindholm, Oxford: Hart Publishing Ltd, 2018, p. 79-99Chapter in book (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The paper seeks to determine to what extent lower national courts are influenced by higher national courts in their application of CJEU case law. In doing so, we study and compare references to CJEU case law in the jurisprudence of Swedish courts of first instance and courts of precedent. We find that Swedish courts of first instance generally speaking identify and apply relevant CJEU case law independent of whether this has been dealt with by Swedish CoP or not. However, when these courts find and cite a Swedish court of precedent decision concerning an issue relating to EU law, they do not consistely consider relevant CJEU case law.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford: Hart Publishing Ltd, 2018
Series
Swedish Studies in European Law ; 10
Keywords
Court of Justice, CJEU, ECJ, national courts, precedent
National Category
Law (excluding Law and Society)
Research subject
Law; europarätt
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-143687 (URN)978-1-50991-908-6 (ISBN)978-1-50991-910-9 (ISBN)978-1-50991-909-3 (ISBN)
Available from: 2018-01-05 Created: 2018-01-05 Last updated: 2018-06-09Bibliographically approved
Derlén, M. & Lindholm, J. (Eds.). (2018). The Court of Justice of the European Union: multidisciplinary perspectives. Oxford: Hart Publishing Ltd
Open this publication in new window or tab >>The Court of Justice of the European Union: multidisciplinary perspectives
2018 (English)Collection (editor) (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

In 2017, the Court of Justice of the European Union celebrates sixty-five years and has thereby achieved retirement age in most EU Member States, including Luxembourg. If it were to retire, the Court would be able to look back at an exciting journey, from its relatively humble beginning on 4 December 1952 as part of the then brand-new European Coal and Steel Community to one of the most important and exciting judicial institutions in Europe, perhaps in the entire world.

The need to understand the CJEU has never been greater. This volume is dedicated to improving our understanding of the Court in relationship to other actors, including other EU institutions, the Member State, national courts, third countries, and international organizations. It is based on a conference arranged by the Swedish Network for European Legal Studies (SNELS) held at Stockholm University in December 2016, and includes contributions by both lawyers and researchers in other fields, as well as current members of the Court.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford: Hart Publishing Ltd, 2018. p. 233
Series
Swedish Studies in European Law ; 10
Keywords
EU law, European Union law, courts, Court of Justice, CJEU, ECJ
National Category
Law (excluding Law and Society)
Research subject
europarätt; Law; Political Science
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-143686 (URN)978-1-50991-908-6 (ISBN)978-1-50991-910-9 (ISBN)978-1-50991-909-3 (ISBN)
Available from: 2018-01-05 Created: 2018-01-05 Last updated: 2018-06-09Bibliographically approved
Derlén, M. & Lindholm, J. (2017). EU-rättens framtid som rättsvetenskaplig disciplin: början på slutet eller slutet på början?. In: Örjan Edström, Johan Lindholm, Ruth Mannelqvist (Ed.), Jubileumsskrift till Juridiska institutionen 40 år: (pp. 79-88). Umeå: Umeå universitet
Open this publication in new window or tab >>EU-rättens framtid som rättsvetenskaplig disciplin: början på slutet eller slutet på början?
2017 (Swedish)In: Jubileumsskrift till Juridiska institutionen 40 år / [ed] Örjan Edström, Johan Lindholm, Ruth Mannelqvist, Umeå: Umeå universitet , 2017, p. 79-88Chapter in book (Other academic)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå: Umeå universitet, 2017
Series
Skrifter från Juridiska institutionen vid Umeå universitet, ISSN 1404-9198 ; 38
National Category
Law (excluding Law and Society)
Research subject
Law
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-141593 (URN)978-91-7601-793-7 (ISBN)
Available from: 2017-11-08 Created: 2017-11-08 Last updated: 2018-06-09Bibliographically approved
Derlén, M. & Lindholm, J. (2017). Från Champagne till Ramlösa: EU-domstolens rättspraxis i svenska underinstanser. Europarättslig tidskrift (4), 695-716
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Från Champagne till Ramlösa: EU-domstolens rättspraxis i svenska underinstanser
2017 (Swedish)In: Europarättslig tidskrift, ISSN 1403-8722, no 4, p. 695-716Article in journal (Other academic) Published
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Europarättslig tidskrift, 2017
National Category
Law (excluding Law and Society)
Research subject
europarätt
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-141868 (URN)
Projects
Rättspraxis som rättskälla
Funder
Torsten Söderbergs stiftelse
Available from: 2017-11-14 Created: 2017-11-14 Last updated: 2018-06-09Bibliographically approved
Derlén, M. & Lindholm, J. (2017). Is it good law?: network analysis and the CJEU's internal market jurisprudence. Journal of international economic law (Oxford), 20(2), 257-277
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Is it good law?: network analysis and the CJEU's internal market jurisprudence
2017 (English)In: Journal of international economic law (Oxford), ISSN 1369-3034, E-ISSN 1464-3758, Vol. 20, no 2, p. 257-277Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

An increasing number of legal scholars have been attracted to using network analysis, particularly by the possibility of conducting large-scale studies of case law. In this article, we discuss how network analysis can provide new and important information about the law governing the European Union’s internal market by making possible the study of the entire jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), including changes over time. We apply different network centrality measurements to key CJEU internal market decisions and compare how accurately they capture the precedential and persuasive power of case law. In so doing, we reach conclusions that can be used to better understand not only the law of the internal market, but also the law of any case law-driven jurisdiction such as WTO dispute settlement or investor–state arbitration.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford University Press, 2017
Keywords
Methodology, network analysis, citation network, centrality, HITS, PageRank, persuasive power, precedential power, Reverse PageRank, HubRank
National Category
Law (excluding Law and Society)
Research subject
europarätt; allmän rättslära; Law
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-137586 (URN)10.1093/jiel/jgx011 (DOI)000407291000003 ()
Funder
Torsten Söderbergs stiftelse
Available from: 2017-07-06 Created: 2017-07-06 Last updated: 2018-06-09Bibliographically approved
Organisations

Search in DiVA

Show all publications