umu.sePublications
Change search
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
BETA
Lindholm, Johan, Professor of LawORCID iD iconorcid.org/0000-0001-6009-7412
Publications (10 of 77) Show all publications
Lindholm, J. (2019). Court of Arbitration for Sport: En framgångsrik trettiofemåring med begynnande medelålderskris?. Juridisk Tidskrift, 2019/20(2), 482-492
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Court of Arbitration for Sport: En framgångsrik trettiofemåring med begynnande medelålderskris?
2019 (Swedish)In: Juridisk Tidskrift, ISSN 1100-7761, E-ISSN 2002-3545, Vol. 2019/20, no 2, p. 482-492Article in journal (Other academic) Published
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Jure, 2019
Keywords
arbitration, arbitration law, sports law, CAS, skiljeförfarande, skiljemannarätt, idrottsjuridik, CAS
National Category
Law (excluding Law and Society)
Research subject
private law; european law
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-165414 (URN)
Available from: 2019-11-25 Created: 2019-11-25 Last updated: 2019-12-03Bibliographically approved
Derlén, M. & Lindholm, J. (2019). Perspektiv på prejudikat: En empirisk undersökning av tingsrätternas bruk av Högsta domstolens rättspraxis i tvistemål. Svensk Juristtidning (8), 751-772
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Perspektiv på prejudikat: En empirisk undersökning av tingsrätternas bruk av Högsta domstolens rättspraxis i tvistemål
2019 (Swedish)In: Svensk Juristtidning, ISSN 0039-6591, no 8, p. 751-772Article in journal (Other academic) Published
Abstract [sv]

Betydelsen av HD:s avgöranden som prejudikat har rönt allt större uppmärksamhet, främst med fokus på hur HD själv ser på sin rättspraxis. Denna artikel kompletterar diskussionen genom att undersöka tingsrätternas bruk av prejudikat. Artikeln visar att endast en relativt liten andel av HD:s avgöranden används aktivt i tingsrätterna och att överlappningen mellan de avgöranden som används av tingsrätterna och de som används av HD själv är ytterst begränsad. En möjlig förklaring är att HD i hög grad prövar frågor som mycket sällan uppkommer i tingsrätterna. Detta är inte nödvändigtvis problematiskt, men motiverar en diskussion om hur HD bäst kan leda rättstillämpningen.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: , 2019
Keywords
Empirical Legal Studies, courts, judicial politics, precedent, empirisk rättsvetenskap, domstolar, domstolspolitik, prejudikat
National Category
Law (excluding Law and Society)
Research subject
Law; public law
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-164309 (URN)
Available from: 2019-10-21 Created: 2019-10-21 Last updated: 2019-10-24Bibliographically approved
Lindholm, J. (2019). The court of arbitration for sport and its jurisprudence: an empirical inquiry into lex sportiva (1ed.). The Hague: Springer
Open this publication in new window or tab >>The court of arbitration for sport and its jurisprudence: an empirical inquiry into lex sportiva
2019 (English)Book (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

This book takes a close look at the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), challenging existing claims and answering previously unanswered questions, by considering all of its publicly available decisions, both in its entirety as a body of jurisprudence and on a case-by-case level.It also investigates the actors involved in adjudication before the CAS, both the parties that bring disputes before the CAS and the arbitrators that resolve them, and in so doing establish precedents that govern sports generally.While the book relies upon and includes more traditional legal theory and analysis, it combines this with an empirical analysis of a large portion of the CAS's decisions. Hereby it relies upon and relates to the theory of the development of a transnational legal order in sports, the lex sportiva.The publication is targeted at and will benefit those professionally working in or interested in the fields of sports law, arbitration law, transnational law, or empirical legal studies.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
The Hague: Springer, 2019. p. 348 Edition: 1
Series
ASSER International Sports Law Series, ISSN 1874-6926, E-ISSN 2215-003X
Keywords
sports law, CAS, network analysis, empirical legal studies, lex sportiva, anational law
National Category
Law (excluding Law and Society)
Research subject
Law; european law; International Law; jurisprudence
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-157553 (URN)10.1007/978-94-6265-285-9 (DOI)978-94-6265-284-2 (ISBN)978-94-6265-285-9 (ISBN)
Available from: 2019-03-26 Created: 2019-03-26 Last updated: 2019-05-20Bibliographically approved
Lindholm, J. (2019). The Netflix‑ication of sports broadcasting. The International Sports Law Journal, 18(3–4), 99-101
Open this publication in new window or tab >>The Netflix‑ication of sports broadcasting
2019 (English)In: The International Sports Law Journal, ISSN 1567-7559, Vol. 18, no 3–4, p. 99-101Article in journal, Editorial material (Other academic) Published
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2019
Keywords
sports broadcast, television, Amazon, rights, competition law
National Category
Law (excluding Law and Society)
Research subject
Law
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-156692 (URN)10.1007/s40318-019-00145-8 (DOI)000460987700001 ()2-s2.0-85062636042 (Scopus ID)
Available from: 2019-02-25 Created: 2019-02-25 Last updated: 2019-04-04Bibliographically approved
Lindholm, J. (2019). The Second Annual International Sports Law Journal Conference. International Sports Law Journal, 19(1-2), 1-1
Open this publication in new window or tab >>The Second Annual International Sports Law Journal Conference
2019 (English)In: International Sports Law Journal, ISSN 1567-7559, Vol. 19, no 1-2, p. 1-1Article in journal, Editorial material (Other academic) Published
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, 2019
National Category
Sport and Fitness Sciences Law and Society
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-164418 (URN)10.1007/s40318-019-00160-9 (DOI)000485311100001 ()
Available from: 2019-10-22 Created: 2019-10-22 Last updated: 2019-10-22Bibliographically approved
Derlén, M. & Lindholm, J. (2019). What happened to the revolution?: one decade with Trailers and MEQRs. In: Ruth Mannelqvist, Staffan Ingmanson, Carin Ulander-Wänman (Ed.), Festskrift till Örjan Edström: (pp. 91-108). Umeå: Department of Law, Umeå University
Open this publication in new window or tab >>What happened to the revolution?: one decade with Trailers and MEQRs
2019 (English)In: Festskrift till Örjan Edström / [ed] Ruth Mannelqvist, Staffan Ingmanson, Carin Ulander-Wänman, Umeå: Department of Law, Umeå University , 2019, p. 91-108Chapter in book (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

In 2009 the CJEU delivered its judgment in the so-called Trailers case, offering a new perspective on the enigmatic ban on measures having an equivalent effect to a quantitative restrictions (MEQRs). Trailers was a positive, even necessary, development in an area fraught with complications but it left many questions as to the future direction of the CJEU. One decade on, and after several notable judgments, we are now in a position to return to those questions. This contribution explores the impact of Trailers and the relevance today of seminal MEQR decisions like DassonvilleKeck and Cassis de Dijon.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå: Department of Law, Umeå University, 2019
Series
Skrifter från Juridiska institutionen vid Umeå universitet, ISSN 1404-9198 ; 41
Keywords
EU law, internal market, free movement of goods, measures equivalent to quantitative restrictions, MEQR
National Category
Law (excluding Law and Society)
Research subject
european law
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-160259 (URN)9789178550784 (ISBN)
Available from: 2019-06-17 Created: 2019-06-17 Last updated: 2019-07-01Bibliographically approved
Lindholm, J. (2019). Who Tweets about Sports Law?. The International Sports Law Journal, 19(3-4), 129-132
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Who Tweets about Sports Law?
2019 (English)In: The International Sports Law Journal, ISSN 1567-7559, Vol. 19, no 3-4, p. 129-132Article in journal, Editorial material (Other academic) Published
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2019
Keywords
sports, sports law, social media, Twitter
National Category
Law (excluding Law and Society)
Research subject
Law; media and communication studies
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-164678 (URN)10.1007/s40318-019-00162-7 (DOI)000490836100001 ()
Available from: 2019-10-26 Created: 2019-10-26 Last updated: 2019-10-28Bibliographically approved
Derlén, M., Lindholm, J. & Naurin, D. (2019). You’re Gonna Miss Me When I’m Gone!: The Impact of Brexit on Member States’ Contribution to the Case Law of the CJEU. Europarättslig tidskrift (3), 381-395
Open this publication in new window or tab >>You’re Gonna Miss Me When I’m Gone!: The Impact of Brexit on Member States’ Contribution to the Case Law of the CJEU
2019 (English)In: Europarättslig tidskrift, ISSN 1403-8722, no 3, p. 381-395Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Brexit is scheduled to happen on October 31, 2019, and researchers have previously studied the impact of Brexit on relationships in the EU’s political institutions. This paper studies how Brexit might affect Member States’ interactions with the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and, more specifically, when they seek to influence the Court by submitting observations. The Untied Kingdom has consistently been a comparatively active Member State, submitting many observations. The paper introduces and employs a novel approach, studying what we call "mentions" in CJEU decisions, to measure position similarity in Member States' observations and to identify the UK's "allies" before the CJEU. The paper concludes the loss of the UK will be felt in particular in Germany, the Netherlands, Ireland and in the Nordic countries. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Europarättslig Tidskrift, 2019
Keywords
EU law, CJEU, judicial politics, observations, position similarity
National Category
Law (excluding Law and Society) Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalisation Studies)
Research subject
european law; Law; political science
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-163563 (URN)
Available from: 2019-09-26 Created: 2019-09-26 Last updated: 2019-09-30Bibliographically approved
Lindholm, J. (2018). End of cash‐for‐player transfers in football?. The International Sports Law Journal, 18(1-2), 1-2
Open this publication in new window or tab >>End of cash‐for‐player transfers in football?
2018 (English)In: The International Sports Law Journal, ISSN 1567-7559, Vol. 18, no 1-2, p. 1-2Article in journal, Editorial material (Other academic) Published
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
The Hague: Springer, 2018
National Category
Law (excluding Law and Society)
Research subject
Law
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-155165 (URN)10.1007/s40318-018-0135-x (DOI)000445498900001 ()
Available from: 2019-01-09 Created: 2019-01-09 Last updated: 2019-01-14Bibliographically approved
Derlén, M. & Lindholm, J. (2018). Serving two masters: CJEU case law in Swedish first instance courts and national courts of precedent as gatekeepers. In: Mattias Derlén and Johan Lindholm (Ed.), The Court of Justice of the European Union: multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 79-99). Oxford: Hart Publishing Ltd
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Serving two masters: CJEU case law in Swedish first instance courts and national courts of precedent as gatekeepers
2018 (English)In: The Court of Justice of the European Union: multidisciplinary perspectives / [ed] Mattias Derlén and Johan Lindholm, Oxford: Hart Publishing Ltd, 2018, p. 79-99Chapter in book (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The paper seeks to determine to what extent lower national courts are influenced by higher national courts in their application of CJEU case law. In doing so, we study and compare references to CJEU case law in the jurisprudence of Swedish courts of first instance and courts of precedent. We find that Swedish courts of first instance generally speaking identify and apply relevant CJEU case law independent of whether this has been dealt with by Swedish CoP or not. However, when these courts find and cite a Swedish court of precedent decision concerning an issue relating to EU law, they do not consistely consider relevant CJEU case law.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford: Hart Publishing Ltd, 2018
Series
Swedish Studies in European Law ; 10
Keywords
Court of Justice, CJEU, ECJ, national courts, precedent
National Category
Law (excluding Law and Society)
Research subject
Law; european law
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-143687 (URN)978-1-50991-908-6 (ISBN)978-1-50991-910-9 (ISBN)978-1-50991-909-3 (ISBN)
Available from: 2018-01-05 Created: 2018-01-05 Last updated: 2018-06-09Bibliographically approved
Projects
The European Court of Justice as Lawmaker: A Search for Coherence in the Development of European Law [2011-01923_VR]; Umeå UniversityJudicial Power and Power over the Judiciary: An Interdisciplinary Study of the Shifting Role of Judges [2018-01383_VR]; Umeå University; Publications
Derlén, M. & Lindholm, J. (2019). Perspektiv på prejudikat: En empirisk undersökning av tingsrätternas bruk av Högsta domstolens rättspraxis i tvistemål. Svensk Juristtidning (8), 751-772
Organisations
Identifiers
ORCID iD: ORCID iD iconorcid.org/0000-0001-6009-7412

Search in DiVA

Show all publications