umu.sePublications
Change search
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
BETA
Kiss, Anett Z
Alternative names
Publications (3 of 3) Show all publications
Myouga, F., Takahashi, K., Tanaka, R., Nagata, N., Kiss, A. Z., Funk, C., . . . Shinozaki, K. (2018). Stable accumulation of photosystem II requires one-helix protein1 (OHP1) of the light harvesting-like family. Plant Physiology, 176(3), 2277-2291
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Stable accumulation of photosystem II requires one-helix protein1 (OHP1) of the light harvesting-like family
Show others...
2018 (English)In: Plant Physiology, ISSN 0032-0889, E-ISSN 1532-2548, Vol. 176, no 3, p. 2277-2291Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The cellular functions of two Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) one-helix proteins, OHP1 and OHP2 (also named LIGH-THARVESTING-LIKE2 [LIL2] and LIL6, respectively, because they have sequence similarity to light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b-binding proteins), remain unclear. Tagged null mutants of OHP1 and OHP2 (ohp1 and ohp2) showed stunted growth with pale-green leaves on agar plates, and these mutants were unable to grow on soil. Leaf chlorophyll fluorescence and the composition of thylakoid membrane proteins revealed that ohp1 deletion substantially affected photosystem II (PSII) core protein function and led to reduced levels of photosystem I core proteins; however, it did not affect LHC accumulation. Transgenic ohp1 plants rescued with OHP1-HA or OHP1-Myc proteins developed a normal phenotype. Using these tagged OHP1 proteins in transgenic plants, we localized OHP1 to thylakoid membranes, where it formed protein complexes with both OHP2 and High Chlorophyll Fluorescence244 (HCF244). We also found PSII core proteins D1/D2, HCF136, and HCF173 and a few other plant-specific proteins associated with the OHP1/OHP2-HCF244 complex, suggesting that these complexes are early intermediates in PSII assembly. OHP1 interacted directly with HCF244 in the complex. Therefore, OHP1 and HCF244 play important roles in the stable accumulation of PSII.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
American Society of Plant Biologists, 2018
National Category
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Plant Biotechnology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-146226 (URN)10.1104/pp.17.01782 (DOI)000426848300032 ()29438089 (PubMedID)
Available from: 2018-04-11 Created: 2018-04-11 Last updated: 2018-06-09Bibliographically approved
Mishra, Y., Johansson Jankanpää, H., Kiss, A. Z., Funk, C., Schröder, W. P. & Jansson, S. (2012). Arabidopsis plants grown in the field and climate chambers significantly differ in leaf morphology and photosystem components. BMC Plant Biology, 12, 6
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Arabidopsis plants grown in the field and climate chambers significantly differ in leaf morphology and photosystem components
Show others...
2012 (English)In: BMC Plant Biology, ISSN 1471-2229, E-ISSN 1471-2229, Vol. 12, p. 6-Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background:Plants exhibit phenotypic plasticity and respond to differences in environmental conditions by acclimation. We have systematically compared leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana plants grown in the field and under controlled low, normal and high light conditions in the laboratory to determine their most prominent phenotypic differences.

Results: Compared to plants grown under field conditions, the "indoor plants" had larger leaves, modified leaf shapes and longer petioles. Their pigment composition also significantly differed; indoor plants had reduced levels of xanthophyll pigments. In addition, Lhcb1 and Lhcb2 levels were up to three times higher in the indoor plants, but differences in the PSI antenna were much smaller, with only the low-abundance Lhca5 protein showing altered levels. Both isoforms of early-light-induced protein (ELIP) were absent in the indoor plants, and they had less non-photochemical quenching (NPQ). The field-grown plants had a high capacity to perform state transitions. Plants lacking ELIPs did not have reduced growth or seed set rates, but their mortality rates were sometimes higher. NPQ levels between natural accessions grown under different conditions were not correlated.

Conclusion: Our results indicate that comparative analysis of field-grown plants with those grown under artificial conditions is important for a full understanding of plant plasticity and adaptation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central, 2012
Keywords
Arabidopsis thaliana, Carotenoids, Chlorophyll fluorescence, Early light inducible proteins (ELIPs), Field Plants, Indoor Plants, Light harvesting proteins (LHCs)
National Category
Biological Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-51175 (URN)10.1186/1471-2229-12-6 (DOI)
Note
Published: 11 January 2012Available from: 2012-01-12 Created: 2012-01-12 Last updated: 2018-06-08Bibliographically approved
Damkjær, J. T., Kereïche, S., Johnson, M. P., Kovacs, L., Kiss, A. Z., Boekema, E. J., . . . Jansson, S. (2009). The photosystem II light-harvesting protein Lhcb3 affects the macrostructure of photosystem II and the rate of state transitions in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 21, 3245-3256
Open this publication in new window or tab >>The photosystem II light-harvesting protein Lhcb3 affects the macrostructure of photosystem II and the rate of state transitions in Arabidopsis
Show others...
2009 (English)In: The Plant Cell, ISSN 1040-4651, E-ISSN 1532-298X, Vol. 21, p. 3245-3256Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The main trimeric light-harvesting complex of higher plants (LHCII) consists of three different Lhcb proteins (Lhcb1-3). We show that Arabidopsis thaliana T-DNA knockout plants lacking Lhcb3 (koLhcb3) compensate for the lack of Lhcb3 by producing increased amounts of Lhcb1 and Lhcb2. As in wild-type plants, LHCII-photosystem II (PSII) supercomplexes were present in Lhcb3 knockout plants (koLhcb3), and preservation of the LHCII trimers (M trimers) indicates that the Lhcb3 in M trimers has been replaced by Lhcb1 and/or Lhcb2. However, the rotational position of the M LHCII trimer was altered, suggesting that the Lhcb3 subunit affects the macrostructural arrangement of the LHCII antenna. The absence of Lhcb3 did not result in any significant alteration in PSII efficiency or qE type of nonphotochemical quenching, but the rate of transition from State 1 to State 2 was increased in koLhcb3, although the final extent of state transition was unchanged. The level of phosphorylation of LHCII was increased in the koLhcb3 plants compared with wild-type plants in both State 1 and State 2. The relative increase in phosphorylation upon transition from State 1 to State 2 was also significantly higher in koLhcb3. It is suggested that the main function of Lhcb3 is to modulate the rate of state transitions.

Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-29921 (URN)10.1105/tpc.108.064006 (DOI)19880802 (PubMedID)
Available from: 2009-11-27 Created: 2009-11-27 Last updated: 2018-06-08Bibliographically approved
Organisations

Search in DiVA

Show all publications