Change search
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Nzayirambaho, ManasseORCID iD
Publications (1 of 1) Show all publications
Hitimana, R., Lindholm, L., Krantz, G., Nzayirambaho, M. & Pulkki-Brännström, A.-M. (2018). Cost of antenatal care for the health sector and for households in Rwanda. BMC Health Services Research, 18, Article ID 262.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Cost of antenatal care for the health sector and for households in Rwanda
Show others...
2018 (English)In: BMC Health Services Research, ISSN 1472-6963, E-ISSN 1472-6963, Vol. 18, article id 262Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Rwanda has made tremendous progress in reduction of maternal mortality in the last twenty years. Antenatal care is believed to have played a role in that progress. In late 2016, the World Health Organization published new antenatal care guidelines recommending an increase from four visits during pregnancy to eight contacts with skilled personnel, among other changes. There is ongoing debate regarding the cost implications and potential outcomes countries can expect, if they make that shift. For Rwanda, a necessary starting point is to understand the cost of current antenatal care practice, which, according to our knowledge, has not been documented so far.

Methods: Cost information was collected from Kigali City and Northern province of Rwanda through two cross-sectional surveys: a household-based survey among women who had delivered a year before the interview (N = 922) and a health facility survey in three public, two faith-based, and one private health facility. A micro costing approach was used to collect health facility data. Household costs included time and transport. Results are reported in 2015 USD.

Results: The societal cost (household + health facility) of antenatal care for the four visits according to current Rwandan guidelines was estimated at $160 in the private health facility and $44 in public and faith-based health facilities. The first visit had the highest cost ($75 in private and $21 in public and faith-based health facilities) compared to the three other visits. Drugs and consumables were the main input category accounting for 54% of the total cost in the private health facility and for 73% in the public and faith-based health facilities.

Conclusions: The unit cost of providing antenatal care services is considerably lower in public than in private health facilities. The household cost represents a small proportion of the total, ranging between 3% and 7%; however, it is meaningful for low-income families. There is a need to do profound equity analysis regarding the accessibility and use of antenatal care services, and to consider ways to reduce households’ time cost as a possible barrier to the use of antenatal care.

Antenatal care, Cost of care, Rwanda
National Category
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-147461 (URN)10.1186/s12913-018-3013-1 (DOI)000430259300002 ()29631583 (PubMedID)
Available from: 2018-05-29 Created: 2018-05-29 Last updated: 2018-11-22Bibliographically approved

Search in DiVA

Show all publications