umu.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Vem dömer i gråzonen?: Domstolsprövning i gränslandet mellan offentlig rätt och privaträtt
Umeå universitet, Samhällsvetenskaplig fakultet, Juridik.
2009 (Svenska)Doktorsavhandling, monografi (Övrigt vetenskapligt)Alternativ titel
Who judges in the twilight zone?  : Adjudication in the borderland between public law and private law (Engelska)
Abstract [en]

The starting point of this thesis is the assertion that the interaction between individuals and public authorities sometimes produces claims which cannot easily be categorized as public or private law claims – “claims in the twilight zone”. The aims of the thesis are to examine to what extent such claims can be determined by a court of law and to establish to which kind of court such a claim is properly to be submitted. Moreover, assuming that there is a division of competence between the general courts and the administrative courts that purport to “cut through” claims in the twilight zone, the thesis examines three specific interests: 1) the interest of effective adjudication of claims in the twilight zone; 2) the interest of upholding the division of competence between the general courts and the administrative courts; and 3) the interest of avoiding parallel decisions on the same subject matter.

     There is much to support the conclusion that claims in the twilight zone have hitherto, with a couple of important exceptions, been adjudicated in the general courts. However, certain ambiguities relating to the proper role of the administrative courts make it uncertain whether this can still be said to be the case. It may perhaps be that the Supreme Court and the Supreme Administrative Court have divergent conceptions of the meaning and effect of a decision made by an administrative court. The present uncertainty makes it difficult to establish to which kind of court a claim in the twilight zone is properly to be submitted, and there is a certain risk that such a claim will not be possible to pursue through a judicial process at all. There is also a certain risk that new boundary lines between public law and private law will be created as a result of procedural ambiguities and not as a result of clear standpoints in matters of substantial law. It is suggested that the situation should be remedied by clarifying the proper role of the administrative courts – or by an amalgamation of the general courts and the administrative courts to one single court system.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Uppsala: Iustus Förlag AB , 2009. , 644 s.
Serie
Skrifter från Juridiska institutionen vid Umeå universitet, ISSN 1404-9198 ; 20
Nyckelord [en]
Administrative Procedure, Civil Procedure, Public Law, Private Law, Enforcement, Twilight Zone, Adjudication
Nyckelord [sv]
Förvaltningsprocess, Civilprocess, Gråzon, Kompetensfördelning, Allmän domstol, Förvaltningsdomstol
Nationell ämneskategori
Juridik (exklusive juridik och samhälle)
Forskningsämne
processrätt
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-26521ISBN: 978-91-7678-733-5 (tryckt)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-26521DiVA: diva2:271690
Distributör:
Juridik, 90187, Umeå
Disputation
2009-12-11, Hörsal C, Samhällsvetarhuset, Umeå universitet, Umeå, 10:15 (Svenska)
Opponent
Handledare
Tillgänglig från: 2009-11-19 Skapad: 2009-10-13 Senast uppdaterad: 2009-11-19Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

fulltext(7233 kB)3577 nedladdningar
Filinformation
Filnamn FULLTEXT01.pdfFilstorlek 7233 kBChecksumma SHA-512
7f8a942900c963aa42533db54858d1dbd64c1deadff66b7a5045a51cd765c828f5b1ac5a4fa4ec11b9563fe37e12fbf9e50a6f3a0090c867d68fe63884046145
Typ fulltextMimetyp application/pdf

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Södergren, Patrik
Av organisationen
Juridik
Juridik (exklusive juridik och samhälle)

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 3577 nedladdningar
Antalet nedladdningar är summan av nedladdningar för alla fulltexter. Det kan inkludera t.ex tidigare versioner som nu inte längre är tillgängliga.

Totalt: 9487 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf