umu.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
För din och andras säkerhet: Konstitutionella proportionalitetskrav och Säkerhetspolisens preventiva tvångsmedel
Umeå universitet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Juridiska institutionen.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-4642-3872
2013 (Svenska)Doktorsavhandling, monografi (Övrigt vetenskapligt)Alternativ titel
For Security Reasons : Constitutional Proportionality and the Electronic Intelligence Gathering Mandate of the Swedish Security Service (Engelska)
Abstract [en]

This doctoral thesis analyzes the balancing and proportionality analyses performed by Swedish legislators over time in the creation of legislation allowing for the interception of communica- tions data and metadata by the Swedish Security Service for intelligence purposes. By examining the concept of proportionality within the field of constitutional law, a framework for performing proportionality tests is identified. This framework is used as a contrast against the actual proportionality analyses performed by legislators in preparatory works, and to analyze three components of the legislators’ policy choices: the legislators’ view of national security, the legislators’ view of privacy; and the effect of technological development on the former two components. These components are analyzed through a study of preparatory works from a historical comparative perspective, allowing for the study of shifts in policy outcomes over time.

The study shows that legislators’ views on national security have shifted during the last 50 years. as could be expected the focus has shifted towards a more preventive approach. Following this development however the study further identifies a shift in the legislators’ views on privacy. Whereas the importance of privacy from a societal perspective seemed pivotal in the ’pre-preventive era’ of communications interception, the view in the last 15 years has gradually shifted towards a view of privacy as an almost exclusively individual interest, resulting in a weakened status of the right to privacy against competing national security interests. Finally, the importance of technological developments within this field can hardly be overestimated. The range of permitted forms of communications interceptions has closely followed what has been technologically possible, and economically feasible to intercept.

Intelligence gathering has increasingly become a legal sphere of its own, where most forms of metadata can be collected without the involvement of the judiciary, and where evidentiary requirements have been lowered to facilitate the use of interception in preventive intelligence gathering. Overall the thesis concludes that these factors have enabled a different outcome of the legislators’ proportionality analyses, where previous ideals have been supplanted by the preventive paradigm.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Uppsala: Iustus förlag, 2013. , 567 s.
Serie
Skrifter från Juridiska institutionen vid Umeå universitet, ISSN 1404-9198 ; 29
Nyckelord [en]
law, constitutional law, proportionality, national security, intelligence, lawful interception, signals intelligence, surveillance, security, security service, Sweden, privacy, private life, ECHR, European convention, human rights, technology, technology neutrality, prevention, constitutional rights
Nyckelord [sv]
juridik, rättsvetenskap, proportionalitet, konstitutionell rätt, rikets säkerhet, nationell säkerhet, säkerhet, underrättelseverksamhet, signalspaning, avlyssning, övervakning, internet, säkerhetspolisen, personlig integritet, privatliv, Europakonventionen, mänskliga rättigheter, teknikneutralitet, prevention, konstitutionella rättigheter
Nationell ämneskategori
Juridik (exklusive juridik och samhälle)
Forskningsämne
juridik
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-82942ISBN: 978-91-7678-866-0 (tryckt)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-82942DiVA: diva2:664052
Disputation
2013-12-06, Samhällsvetarhuset, S205h, Umeå universitet, Umeå, 10:15 (Svenska)
Opponent
Handledare
Tillgänglig från: 2013-11-15 Skapad: 2013-11-13 Senast uppdaterad: 2015-01-20Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

fulltext(6556 kB)2493 nedladdningar
Filinformation
Filnamn FULLTEXT01.pdfFilstorlek 6556 kBChecksumma SHA-512
adcecda26f64d1698662324f9be405162fe5dfad1ade1ecd298c550126258080e7adbd16adb2be02a86234942f1aa71bf23161383804b02cdfc4d57282ccc846
Typ fulltextMimetyp application/pdf

Personposter BETA

Naarttijärvi, Markus

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Naarttijärvi, Markus
Av organisationen
Juridiska institutionen
Juridik (exklusive juridik och samhälle)

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 2493 nedladdningar
Antalet nedladdningar är summan av nedladdningar för alla fulltexter. Det kan inkludera t.ex tidigare versioner som nu inte längre är tillgängliga.

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

isbn
urn-nbn
Totalt: 4396 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf