umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Intracameral anesthesia for cataract surgery: a population-based study on patient satisfaction and outcome
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Ophthalmology. Eye Clinic, Sunderby Hospital, Luleå, Sweden.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Ophthalmology.
2013 (English)In: Clinical Ophthalmology, ISSN 1177-5467, E-ISSN 1177-5483, no 7, p. 2063-2068Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

PURPOSE: To evaluate if the standard anesthetic regimen - topical combined with intracameral anesthesia without sedation - in a population-based cohort of unselected cataract surgery cases is adequate, optimal, and good practice, or if improvements are necessary.

METHODS: We conducted a prospective, observational study on all cases of cataract surgery during a 1-year period at one institution (n=1249). Data were collected from the patients' records. Outcome measures were use of preoperative sedation, type of anesthesia, complications, and adverse events. In a subgroup of patients (n=124) satisfaction with the anesthetic regimen was evaluated using a short questionnaire.

RESULTS: Most cases (90%, 1125/1249) had combined topical and intracameral anesthesia without sedation. Patients who chose preoperative sedation (midazolam hydrochloride sublingually) were significantly younger and more often female (P=0.0001 and P=0.011, respectively). In the questionnaire subgroup, the median pain score after surgery was 0.7 (visual analog scale, 0-10). A pain score of 1.9 or less was reported by 76% of the patients. Patients reporting a pain score of 2 or more had sedation and additional anesthetics more often. No significant difference was found regarding age, sex, pulse rate, oxygen saturation, first or second eye surgery, or adverse intraoperative events for patients with pain scores of 1.9 or less and 2 or more.

CONCLUSION: This large population-based series of small-incision phacoemulsification surgery shows that combined topical and intracameral anesthesia without sedatives is well tolerated for most phacoemulsification patients. It is also effective in cases when complications or adverse events occur. It is important to be responsive to the individual patient's needs and adjust operating procedures if necessary, as there were a few patients who experienced insufficient anesthesia.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Dove Medical Press Ltd , 2013. no 7, p. 2063-2068
Keywords [en]
anesthesia, local/methods, phacoemulsification, cataract extraction, humans, prospective observational studies
National Category
Ophthalmology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-90954DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S51409PubMedID: 24204107OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-90954DiVA, id: diva2:732465
Available from: 2014-07-04 Created: 2014-07-04 Last updated: 2018-10-31Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Safety and  efficacy in the cataract surgery process
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Safety and  efficacy in the cataract surgery process
2018 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Background

Cataract and age-related macular degeneration (AMD) are two major causes for visual impairment in the elderly. Cataract surgery is one of the most common surgical interventions performed in the western world. As a consequence of the increasing number of operations performed, postoperative visits are a large workload for surgical units. It is important that all parts of the cataract surgery procedure are appropriate and cost-effective. During the last 20 years the trend is towards fewer visits both pre- as well as postoperatively. The number and timing of postoperative visits are also a subject of an ongoing debate. Few studies have previously evaluated safety perspectives concerning the number and timing of post-operative visits.

The last decade, new treatments for wet AMD have evolved and the number of patients receiving treatment has increased. It has been debated if blue-blocking intraocular lenses (IOL) have a protective effect on the development of wet AMD and decreasing the need for AMD-treatment after cataract surgery.

Aims

To analyse parts of the modern cataract surgery process including peri- and post-operative routines from a safety and efficacy perspective. To analyse pre- and perioperative risk factors as well as protective factors associated with the need for wet AMD-treatment after cataract surgery.

Methods

I, II. These prospective, observational cohort studies included all cataract surgery cases (n=1249) during a 1-year period, at one institution. The cohort was analysed regarding the use of a standardized anaesthetic regimen and the safety perspectives, when the standard routine is no planned postoperative visit in uncomplicated cases without ocular comorbidity.

III. The above-mentioned cohort (study group), was compared with a cohort from another clinic (control group) with a different follow-up routine, i.e. each case with first eye cataract surgery had a planned postoperative visit. In the control group all patients (n= 1162 cases) had surgery during the same 1-year period. The number of planned and unplanned visits was recorded, and the surgical outcome from the two institutions was compared.

IV. A register-based cohort study included all patients registered in the Swedish National Cataract Register and the Swedish Macula Register in 2010 - 2017, to find all eyes with past cataract surgery that were subsequently treated for wet AMD. Complete registry data was used for comparisons and analyses of pre- and peri-operative risk- and protective factors for wet AMD treatment after cataract surgery.

Results

I. A standardized anaesthetic method with topical and intracameral anaesthetics without sedation was used in most cases (90%). Median pain score after surgery was 0.7 (VAS 0-10) and most patients (97%) would choose the same anaesthetic method again.

II, III. Evaluation of all medical records 2 years after the cataract surgery procedure, found no report of missed adverse events. Significantly less patients in the study group (9% vs 16%; p=0.000036) initiated a postoperative unplanned contact compared with the control group. Patients with 70 km or longer to the hospital were less inclined to seek unplanned care (p=0.016).

IV. Female gender and high age are associated with an increased risk of needing treatment for wet AMD ≥1 year after cataract surgery. Eyes with a diagnosis of AMD preoperatively, and subsequently treated for wet AMD, had a significantly (p=0.023) lower degree of blue-blocking IOLs implanted at their previous cataract surgery.

Conclusion

I. A standardized anaesthetic method with topical and intracameral anaesthetics without sedation seems well tolerated by the patients, and is effective at cataract surgery, also in cases when complications/adverse events occur.

II, III. Without compromising patient safety, it is possible to refrain from standard postoperative visits after cataract surgery in patients with uncomplicated surgery and no ocular comorbidity. A significant reduction in postoperative visits is only obtained if the standard routine applies to both first and second eye surgery.

IV. Patients without preoperative AMD have no benefit from the use of blue-blocking IOLs. In patients with preoperatively diagnosed AMD, blue-blocking IOLs may offer some protection from the subsequent development of AMD.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå: Umeå Universitet, 2018. p. 60
Series
Umeå University medical dissertations, ISSN 0346-6612 ; 1989
Keywords
Cataract, prospective cohort study, patient safety, age-related macular degeneration
National Category
Ophthalmology
Research subject
Ophtalmology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-152946 (URN)978-91-7601-955-9 (ISBN)
Public defence
2018-11-23, Hörsal D, Unod T9, plan 9 Tandläkarhögskolan, Norrlands Universitetssjukhus, Umeå, 09:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2018-11-02 Created: 2018-10-31 Last updated: 2018-11-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(447 kB)3 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 447 kBChecksum SHA-512
3f3f94c4da5f7617519a44672491127d3ebbc3fdda64f06ab659f5b9e073e6bada64a26fac2b9058c773ea0d213cfa94196eb0fe1647e0357a48519400644e90
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Mönestam, Eva

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Westborg, IngerMönestam, Eva
By organisation
Ophthalmology
In the same journal
Clinical Ophthalmology
Ophthalmology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 3 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 98 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf