umu.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
`Modernization’ and the emergence of public policy advocacy: the construction of legitimate advocate roles
Umeå universitet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Pedagogiska institutionen. Centre for Sort Policy and Politics, University of Otago, New Zealand.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-9619-801X
Centre for Sort Policy and Politics, University of Otago, New Zealand.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-2625-4426
2018 (engelsk)Inngår i: Book of abstracts: Sport, Discriminations and Inclusion: Challenges to Face, Bordeaux: EASS , 2018, s. 104-104Konferansepaper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Fagfellevurdert)
Abstract [en]

Because public policy advocacy involves participation in and impact on public policy process, it is often considered as inherently good not only for a society's democracy but also for the advocating organization. The purpose of this paper is to critically examine this supposition by analyzing how changes in volume and shape of advocacy conducted by voluntary sport organizations relate to broader issues of ‘modernization' of voluntary sport. The paper thus seeks to unveil how a seemingly positive development might have unintended and potentially adverse consequences for organizations that gain legitimacy from their standing as a voluntary, democratically governed organization. The paper builds theoretically on the concept of ‘institutionally legitimized roles' and empirically on 50 interviews with representatives of Swedish voluntary sport. This research seeks to determine which officials (e.g., paid or volunteer) adopt the role of ‘appropriate' representatives in advocacy endeavours, why and under what conditions. It also aims to investigate whether the strategic composition of the ‘advocacy team' is reflective (or a driver) of changes in institutionalized roles and the ‘modernization' of voluntary sport. The initial analysis shows the construction of four legitimate advocacy roles: Revolving door-, Elite-, Street-level-, and Proxy-advocates. There is moreover a clear emphasis on paid professionals and organization-external spokespersons – not elected officials – as legitimate representatives in advocacy. The internal ranking of advocacy roles in terms of their relative importance thus shows how changes in volume and form of advocacy interrelates with processes of ‘modernization'.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Bordeaux: EASS , 2018. s. 104-104
Emneord [en]
advocacy, public policy, sport organisations, voluntary sport, institutionalized roles, legitimacy
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-151482OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-151482DiVA, id: diva2:1245183
Konferanse
15th European Association for Sociology of Sport Conference, Bordeaux, France, 23 - 26 May, 2018
Tilgjengelig fra: 2018-09-04 Laget: 2018-09-04 Sist oppdatert: 2018-09-06

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Stenling, CeciliaSam, Mike
Av organisasjonen

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric

urn-nbn
Totalt: 53 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf