umu.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
An Argumentation-based Approach for Identifying and Dealing with Incompatibilities among Procedural Goals
Federal University of Technology - Paraná (UTFPR), Curitiba, Brazil.
Umeå universitet, Teknisk-naturvetenskapliga fakulteten, Institutionen för datavetenskap.ORCID-id: 0000-0003-4072-8795
Federal University of Technology - Paraná (UTFPR), Curitiba, Brazil.
Artificial Intelligence Research Institute (IIIA-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain.
Vise andre og tillknytning
2019 (engelsk)Inngår i: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, ISSN 0888-613X, E-ISSN 1873-4731, Vol. 105, s. 1-26Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

During the first step of practical reasoning, i.e. deliberation, an intelligent agent generates a set of pursuable goals and then selects which of them he commits to achieve. An intelligent agent may in general generate multiple pursuable goals, which may be incompatible among them. In this paper, we focus on the definition, identification and resolution of these incompatibilities. The suggested approach considers the three forms of incompatibility introduced by Castelfranchi and Paglieri, namely the terminal incompatibility, the instrumental or resources incompatibility and the superfluity. We characterize computationally these forms of incompatibility by means of arguments that represent the plans that allow an agent to achieve his goals. Thus, the incompatibility among goals is defined based on the conflicts among their plans, which are represented by means of attacks in an argumentation framework. We also work on the problem of goals selection; we propose to use abstract argumentation theory to deal with this problem, i.e. by applying argumentation semantics. We use a modified version of the “cleaner world” scenario in order to illustrate the performance of our proposal.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Elsevier, 2019. Vol. 105, s. 1-26
Emneord [en]
Intelligent agents, Goals conflicts, Argumentation, Goals incompatibility, Practical reasoning
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
data- och systemvetenskap
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-154428DOI: 10.1016/j.ijar.2018.10.015OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-154428DiVA, id: diva2:1271665
Tilgjengelig fra: 2018-12-17 Laget: 2018-12-17 Sist oppdatert: 2019-01-25bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekst

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Nieves, Juan Carlos
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 408 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf