Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Epidemiology of hydrocele and spermatocele; incidence, treatment and complications
Umeå universitet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för kirurgisk och perioperativ vetenskap, Urologi och andrologi.
Umeå universitet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för kirurgisk och perioperativ vetenskap, Urologi och andrologi. Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Vise andre og tillknytning
2019 (engelsk)Inngår i: Scandinavian journal of urology, ISSN 2168-1805, E-ISSN 2168-1813, Vol. 53, nr 2-3, s. 134-138Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Objectives: To estimate the incidence of men seeking specialized care and receiving treatment for hydro or spermatocele complaints. Also, to determine the risk of complications of treatment.

Materials and methods: The total number of men living in Sweden each year from 2005 to 2014 was used to calculate incidence and age distribution of adult (≥18 years) men seeking specialized healthcare with either hydro or spermatocele. This was done by using nationwide registries, mandatory by law. They contain information on primary or discharge diagnosis, procedure codes and antibiotic prescriptions. Also, complication rates comparing aspiration (with or without sclerotherapy) and conventional surgery were analysed.

Results: The incidence of men with either hydro or spermatocele diagnosis in specialized healthcare was ∼100/100,000 men. The treatment incidence was 17/100,000 men. Orchiectomy was used as primary treatment in 2.4% of cases. The risk of experiencing a complication was clinically and statistically significantly increased with conventional surgery as compared with aspiration, 17.5% (1607/9174) vs 4.6% (181/3920), corresponding to relative risk of 3.79 (95% CI = 3.27–4.40). Hematoma and infections were the most common complications.

Conclusion: Hydro and spermatoceles are common, affecting elderly men. Aspiration seems advantageous with respect to complications and can be recommended due to the benign course of the disease. The indication for conventional surgery might be questioned such as the use of orchiectomy as primary treatment.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Taylor & Francis, 2019. Vol. 53, nr 2-3, s. 134-138
Emneord [en]
Testicular hydrocele, spermatocele, incidence, postoperative complications
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-158954DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2019.1600582ISI: 000465949700001PubMedID: 30990342Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85064609438OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-158954DiVA, id: diva2:1318322
Tilgjengelig fra: 2019-05-27 Laget: 2019-05-27 Sist oppdatert: 2023-03-24bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstPubMedScopus

Person

Lundström, Karl-JohanStattin, Pär

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Lundström, Karl-JohanStattin, PärNordin, Pär
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Scandinavian journal of urology

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 240 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf