umu.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Evidence-based evaluation of information: the centrality and limitations of systematic reviews
Umeå universitet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för folkhälsa och klinisk medicin, Yrkes- och miljömedicin.
Department of Sociology and Work Science, University of Gothenburg.
2014 (engelsk)Inngår i: Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, ISSN 1403-4948, E-ISSN 1651-1905, Vol. 42, nr 13 suppl, s. 3-10Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

This introductory paper considers the value and limitations of the methodology of systematic reviews especially according to the evidence-based movement. It explains some terms and organisations producing systematic reviews. It also discusses controversies. The first concerns the criteria by which the quality of individual studies is assessed, the second the possible effects of the affiliation of some reviewers, and the third the value of formalisation of procedure (i.e. the tensions between formal tools and professional judgments). The article contrasts the evidence-based formalism with other formalisms as those by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the International Agency for Research on Cancer. It discusses systematic reviews in social science where interventions are complex, difficult to blind, and depend on context. Systematic reviews in working life research are often focusing on prevention. The formal evidence-based process may devaluate or disregard findings from mechanistic and observational studies. Hence such reviews may falsely conclude that existing knowledge about the risk of the factor is limited or nonexistent.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2014. Vol. 42, nr 13 suppl, s. 3-10
Emneord [en]
IARC, IPCC, social work, working life research
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-86280DOI: 10.1177/1403494813516713ISI: 000331466700001PubMedID: 24553849OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-86280DiVA, id: diva2:698290
Tilgjengelig fra: 2014-02-21 Laget: 2014-02-21 Sist oppdatert: 2018-06-08bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

fulltext(238 kB)560 nedlastinger
Filinformasjon
Fil FULLTEXT02.pdfFilstørrelse 238 kBChecksum SHA-512
8de5c6a262d8db32d4fff52aae3882b583d42469c59521615f71c5123094776e55c9a64fa5e0db5d9912afbe3b9c18dc9eb01e45dfaf09ea08fbebf247b24751
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstPubMed

Personposter BETA

Järvholm, Bengt

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Järvholm, Bengt
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 560 nedlastinger
Antall nedlastinger er summen av alle nedlastinger av alle fulltekster. Det kan for eksempel være tidligere versjoner som er ikke lenger tilgjengelige

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 480 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf