umu.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Work Disability After Robot-assisted or Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Nationwide, Population-based Study
Vise andre og tillknytning
2016 (engelsk)Inngår i: European Urology, ISSN 0302-2838, E-ISSN 1873-7560, Vol. 70, nr 1, s. 64-71Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Resurstyp
Text
Abstract [en]

Background: Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has been associated with reduced bleeding and shorter hospital stays than open retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP), but it is unclear whether these differences translate into shorter absence from work. Objective: To investigate short-and long-term rates of work disability following RARP and RRP. Design, setting, and participants: We conducted a nationwide population-based cohort study of 2571 men of working age treated with RARP or RRP between 2007 and 2009 identified in the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden. Information about physician-certified sick leave and disability pension was retrieved from the Swedish Social Insurance Agency through 2012. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: We used Cox regression to calculate time to return to work (RTW, or duration of sick leave) after surgery and used generalised estimating equations to analyse days lost from work (because of sick leave and disability pension) after RTW. Results and limitations: Men treated with RARP returned to work after a median of 35 d, whereas the corresponding time for RRP was 48 d (p < 0.001). The difference was seen early; within the first month, men treated with RARP returned to work nearly four times faster than men treated with RRP (adjusted relative RTW rate 3.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.04-4.66). During a median of 3.6 yr after return to work, men treated with RARP lost fewer days from work per person-year than men treated with RRP-12 d versus 15 d-but the association was not statistically significant (p = 0.10). The adjusted rate ratio was 1.08 (95% CI, 0.82-1.42). One limitation is the nonrandomised design of this study. Conclusions: RARP was associated with a faster RTW compared with RRP, but the surgical method did not influence long-term rates of work disability in terms of days lost from work after RTW. Patient summary: We compared disease-related absence from work between two surgical methods for the removal of the prostate. Robot-assisted surgery was associated with a faster return to work compared with open surgery but did not influence absence from work in a long-term perspective. 

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2016. Vol. 70, nr 1, s. 64-71
Emneord [en]
Disability pension, Prostate cancer, Prostatectomy, Retropubic radical prostatectomy, Robot-assisted dical prostatectomy, Return to work, Sick leave, Sweden, Work disability
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-123046DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.049ISI: 000377290100027PubMedID: 26782345OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-123046DiVA, id: diva2:954446
Tilgjengelig fra: 2016-08-22 Laget: 2016-06-27 Sist oppdatert: 2018-06-07bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstPubMed

Personposter BETA

Stattin, Pär

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Stattin, Pär
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
European Urology

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 27 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf