Umeå universitets logga

umu.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Health Technology Assessment and Priority Setting Processes for Medical Technologies in Sweden
Umeå universitet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för folkhälsa och klinisk medicin, Epidemiologi och global hälsa.
2018 (Engelska)Självständigt arbete på avancerad nivå (magisterexamen), 10 poäng / 15 hpStudentuppsats (Examensarbete)
Abstract [en]

One challenge for health care is that resources are limited. With a rising demand for care and the pace of technological innovations, priority setting has become more important than ever for decision-makers. This study describes Health Technology Assessment (HTA) as a systematic evaluation of products based as well as methods based medical technologies. HTA are performed in HTA-organizations. HTA is a process and a knowledge basis used in priority setting when decision-makers prioritize between medical technologies within health care. A priority setting that follows the framework Accountability for Reasonableness (A4R) be a fair process. The main objective of this thesis is to identify and map the existing regional HTA-organizations in Sweden and to map the priority setting process. Additionally, seek to analyse the HTA-production and the priority setting decision process of medical technologies through the framework A4R. Key informant interviews were conducted, and relevant documents were reviewed. The key informants were selected by their involvement or knowledge in the priority setting process. The results indicate that both the HTA-organizations and the priority setting processes are structured differently in different regions. This implies that each region/county council have different preconditions and should within themselves decide how to best form an HTA-organization. The processes of HTA-production meet the A4R conditions and can, therefore, be judged to be fair. The priority setting in selected regions/county council does not fully meet the A4R conditions and, according to the framework, cannot consider to be fair.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
2018. , s. 46
Serie
Centre for Public Health Report Series, ISSN 1651-341X ; 2018:38
Nyckelord [en]
Health Technology Assessment, Accountability for Reasonableness, Priority setting
Nationell ämneskategori
Folkhälsovetenskap, global hälsa och socialmedicin
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-152749OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-152749DiVA, id: diva2:1257592
Externt samarbete
Västerbottens läns landsting, Susanne Waldau
Utbildningsprogram
Masterprogram i folkhälsovetenskap
Presentation
2018-05-22, Caring Science building, Room B101, Umeå University, Umeå, 09:00 (Engelska)
Handledare
Examinatorer
Tillgänglig från: 2018-10-22 Skapad: 2018-10-22 Senast uppdaterad: 2025-02-21Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Ulfsdotter Gunnarsson, Katarina
Av organisationen
Epidemiologi och global hälsa
Folkhälsovetenskap, global hälsa och socialmedicin

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

urn-nbn
Totalt: 247 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf