umu.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
An Argumentation-based Approach for Identifying and Dealing with Incompatibilities among Procedural Goals
Federal University of Technology - Paraná (UTFPR), Curitiba, Brazil.
Umeå universitet, Teknisk-naturvetenskapliga fakulteten, Institutionen för datavetenskap.ORCID-id: 0000-0003-4072-8795
Federal University of Technology - Paraná (UTFPR), Curitiba, Brazil.
Artificial Intelligence Research Institute (IIIA-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain.
Visa övriga samt affilieringar
2019 (Engelska)Ingår i: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, ISSN 0888-613X, E-ISSN 1873-4731, Vol. 105, s. 1-26Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

During the first step of practical reasoning, i.e. deliberation, an intelligent agent generates a set of pursuable goals and then selects which of them he commits to achieve. An intelligent agent may in general generate multiple pursuable goals, which may be incompatible among them. In this paper, we focus on the definition, identification and resolution of these incompatibilities. The suggested approach considers the three forms of incompatibility introduced by Castelfranchi and Paglieri, namely the terminal incompatibility, the instrumental or resources incompatibility and the superfluity. We characterize computationally these forms of incompatibility by means of arguments that represent the plans that allow an agent to achieve his goals. Thus, the incompatibility among goals is defined based on the conflicts among their plans, which are represented by means of attacks in an argumentation framework. We also work on the problem of goals selection; we propose to use abstract argumentation theory to deal with this problem, i.e. by applying argumentation semantics. We use a modified version of the “cleaner world” scenario in order to illustrate the performance of our proposal.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Elsevier, 2019. Vol. 105, s. 1-26
Nyckelord [en]
Intelligent agents, Goals conflicts, Argumentation, Goals incompatibility, Practical reasoning
Nationell ämneskategori
Datorsystem
Forskningsämne
data- och systemvetenskap
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-154428DOI: 10.1016/j.ijar.2018.10.015OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-154428DiVA, id: diva2:1271665
Tillgänglig från: 2018-12-17 Skapad: 2018-12-17 Senast uppdaterad: 2019-01-25Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltext

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Nieves, Juan Carlos
Av organisationen
Institutionen för datavetenskap
I samma tidskrift
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
Datorsystem

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 405 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf