umu.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Intracameral anesthesia for cataract surgery: a population-based study on patient satisfaction and outcome
Umeå universitet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för klinisk vetenskap, Oftalmiatrik.
Umeå universitet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för klinisk vetenskap, Oftalmiatrik.
2013 (Engelska)Ingår i: Clinical Ophthalmology, ISSN 1177-5467, E-ISSN 1177-5483, nr 7, s. 2063-2068Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

PURPOSE: To evaluate if the standard anesthetic regimen - topical combined with intracameral anesthesia without sedation - in a population-based cohort of unselected cataract surgery cases is adequate, optimal, and good practice, or if improvements are necessary.

METHODS: We conducted a prospective, observational study on all cases of cataract surgery during a 1-year period at one institution (n=1249). Data were collected from the patients' records. Outcome measures were use of preoperative sedation, type of anesthesia, complications, and adverse events. In a subgroup of patients (n=124) satisfaction with the anesthetic regimen was evaluated using a short questionnaire.

RESULTS: Most cases (90%, 1125/1249) had combined topical and intracameral anesthesia without sedation. Patients who chose preoperative sedation (midazolam hydrochloride sublingually) were significantly younger and more often female (P=0.0001 and P=0.011, respectively). In the questionnaire subgroup, the median pain score after surgery was 0.7 (visual analog scale, 0-10). A pain score of 1.9 or less was reported by 76% of the patients. Patients reporting a pain score of 2 or more had sedation and additional anesthetics more often. No significant difference was found regarding age, sex, pulse rate, oxygen saturation, first or second eye surgery, or adverse intraoperative events for patients with pain scores of 1.9 or less and 2 or more.

CONCLUSION: This large population-based series of small-incision phacoemulsification surgery shows that combined topical and intracameral anesthesia without sedatives is well tolerated for most phacoemulsification patients. It is also effective in cases when complications or adverse events occur. It is important to be responsive to the individual patient's needs and adjust operating procedures if necessary, as there were a few patients who experienced insufficient anesthesia.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Dove Medical Press Ltd , 2013. nr 7, s. 2063-2068
Nyckelord [en]
anesthesia, local/methods, phacoemulsification, cataract extraction, humans, prospective observational studies
Nationell ämneskategori
Oftalmologi
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-90954DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S51409PubMedID: 24204107OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-90954DiVA, id: diva2:732465
Tillgänglig från: 2014-07-04 Skapad: 2014-07-04 Senast uppdaterad: 2018-06-07Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextPubMed

Personposter BETA

Mönestam, Eva

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Mönestam, Eva
Av organisationen
Oftalmiatrik
I samma tidskrift
Clinical Ophthalmology
Oftalmologi

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 95 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf