umu.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Learning mathematics without a suggested solution method: durable effects on performance and brain activity
Umeå universitet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Institutionen för psykologi. Umeå universitet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för integrativ medicinsk biologi (IMB). Umeå universitet, Medicinska fakulteten, Umeå centrum för funktionell hjärnavbildning (UFBI).
Umeå universitet, Teknisk-naturvetenskapliga fakulteten, Institutionen för naturvetenskapernas och matematikens didaktik. Umeå universitet, Teknisk-naturvetenskapliga fakulteten, Umeå forskningscentrum för matematikdidaktik (UFM).
Umeå universitet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Institutionen för psykologi.
Karlstad, Sweden.
Visa övriga samt affilieringar
2015 (Engelska)Ingår i: Trends in Neuroscience and Education, ISSN 2211-9493, Vol. 4, nr 1-2, s. 6-14Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

A dominant mathematics teaching method is to present a solution method and let pupils repeatedly practice it. An alternative method is to let pupils create a solution method themselves. The current study compared these two approaches in terms of lasting effects on performance and brain activity. Seventythree participants practiced mathematics according to one of the two approaches. One week later, participants underwent fMRI while being tested on the practice tasks. Participants who had created the solution method themselves performed better at the test questions. In both conditions, participants engaged a fronto-parietal network more when solving test questions compared to a baseline task. Importantly, participants who had created the solution method themselves showed relatively lower brain activity in angular gyrus, possibly reflecting reduced demands on verbal memory. These results indicate that there might be advantages to creating the solution method oneself, and thus have implications for the design of teaching methods.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Elsevier, 2015. Vol. 4, nr 1-2, s. 6-14
Nyckelord [en]
Mathematics, Learning, fMRI, Parietal cortex, Angular gyrus, Education
Nationell ämneskategori
Psykologi (exklusive tillämpad psykologi)
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-109088DOI: 10.1016/j.tine.2015.03.002ISI: 000363545300002OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-109088DiVA, id: diva2:854762
Tillgänglig från: 2015-09-17 Skapad: 2015-09-17 Senast uppdaterad: 2018-06-07Bibliografiskt granskad
Ingår i avhandling
1. On Mathematical Reasoning: being told or finding out
Öppna denna publikation i ny flik eller fönster >>On Mathematical Reasoning: being told or finding out
2016 (Engelska)Doktorsavhandling, sammanläggning (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
Alternativ titel[sv]
Om Matematiska resonemang : att få veta eller att få upptäcka
Abstract [en]

School-mathematics has been shown to mainly comprise rote-learning of procedures where the considerations of intrinsic mathematical properties are scarce. At the same time theories and syllabi emphasize competencies like problem solving and reasoning. This thesis will therefore concern how task design can influence the reasoning that students apply when solving tasks, and how the reasoning during practice is associated to students’ results, cognitive capacity, and brain activity. In studies 1-3, we examine the efficiency of different types of reasoning (i.e., algorithmic reasoning (AR) or creative mathematically founded reasoning (CMR)) in between-groups designs. We use mathematics grade, gender, and cognitive capacity as matching variables to get similar groups. We let the groups practice 14 different solution methods with tasks designed to promote either AR or CMR, and after one week the students are tested on the practiced solution methods. In study 3 the students did the test in and fMRI-scanner to study if the differing practice would yield any lasting differences in brain activation. Study 4 had a different approach and focused details in students’ reasoning when working on teacher constructed tasks in an ordinary classroom environment. Here we utilized audio-recordings of students’ solving tasks, together with interviews with teachers and students to unravel the reasoning sequences that students embark on. The turning points where the students switch subtask and the reasoning between these points were characterized and visualized. The behavioral results suggest that CMR is more efficient than AR, and also less dependent on cognitive capacity during the test. The latter is confirmed by fMRI, which showed that AR had higher activation than CMR in areas connected to memory retrieval and working memory. The behavioral result also suggested that CMR is more beneficial for cognitively less proficient students than for the high achievers. Also, task design is essential for both students’ choice of reasoning and task progression. The findings suggest that: 1) since CMR is more efficient than AR, students need to encounter more CMR, both during task solving and in teacher presentation, 2) cognitive capacity is important but depending on task design, cognitive strain will be more or less high during test situations, 3) although AR-tasks does not prohibit the use of CMR they make it less likely to occur. Since CMR-tasks can emphasize important mathematical properties, are more efficient than AR- tasks, and more beneficial for less cognitively proficient students, promoting CMR can be essential if we want students to become mathematically literate. 

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Umeå: Umeå universitet, 2016. s. 55
Serie
Doctoral thesis / Umeå University, Department of Mathematics, ISSN 1102-8300
Nyckelord
mathematics education, creative reasoning, reasoning, cognitive proficiency, fMRI
Nationell ämneskategori
Utbildningsvetenskap Matematik Didaktik Lärande
Forskningsämne
matematikdidaktik
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-124677 (URN)978-91-7601-525-4 (ISBN)
Externt samarbete:
Disputation
2016-09-16, MA121, MIT-huset, Umeå, 13:00 (Svenska)
Opponent
Handledare
Tillgänglig från: 2016-08-25 Skapad: 2016-08-22 Senast uppdaterad: 2018-06-07Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltext

Personposter BETA

Karlsson Wirebring, LinneaLithner, JohanJonsson, BertNorqvist, MathiasNyberg, Lars

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Karlsson Wirebring, LinneaLithner, JohanJonsson, BertNorqvist, MathiasNyberg, Lars
Av organisationen
Institutionen för psykologiInstitutionen för integrativ medicinsk biologi (IMB)Umeå centrum för funktionell hjärnavbildning (UFBI)Institutionen för naturvetenskapernas och matematikens didaktikUmeå forskningscentrum för matematikdidaktik (UFM)Institutionen för matematik och matematisk statistikDiagnostisk radiologi
Psykologi (exklusive tillämpad psykologi)

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 943 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf