umu.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Evidence-informed policy formulation and implementation: a comparative case study of two national policies for improving health and social care in Sweden
Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm.
Umeå universitet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för folkhälsa och klinisk medicin, Epidemiologi och global hälsa. Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm.
Umeå universitet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för folkhälsa och klinisk medicin, Epidemiologi och global hälsa. Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm.
Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm; Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm; Center for Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden.
2015 (Engelska)Ingår i: Implementation Science, ISSN 1748-5908, E-ISSN 1748-5908, Vol. 10, nr 1, s. 169-179Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Evidence has come to play a central role in health policymaking. However, policymakers tend to use other types of information besides research evidence. Most prior studies on evidence-informed policy have focused on the policy formulation phase without a systematic analysis of its implementation. It has been suggested that in order to fully understand the policy process, the analysis should include both policy formulation and implementation. The purpose of the study was to explore and compare two policies aiming to improve health and social care in Sweden and to empirically test a new conceptual model for evidence-informed policy formulation and implementation.

METHODS: Two concurrent national policies were studied during the entire policy process using a longitudinal, comparative case study approach. Data was collected through interviews, observations, and documents. A Conceptual Model for Evidence-Informed Policy Formulation and Implementation was developed based on prior frameworks for evidence-informed policymaking and policy dissemination and implementation. The conceptual model was used to organize and analyze the data.

RESULTS: The policies differed regarding the use of evidence in the policy formulation and the extent to which the policy formulation and implementation phases overlapped. Similarities between the cases were an emphasis on capacity assessment, modified activities based on the assessment, and a highly active implementation approach relying on networks of stakeholders. The Conceptual Model for Evidence-Informed Policy Formulation and Implementation was empirically useful to organize the data.

CONCLUSIONS: The policy actors' roles and functions were found to have a great influence on the choices of strategies and collaborators in all policy phases. The Conceptual Model for Evidence-Informed Policy Formulation and Implementation was found to be useful. However, it provided insufficient guidance for analyzing actors involved in the policy process, capacity-building strategies, and overlapping policy phases. A revised version of the model that includes these aspects is suggested.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
BioMed Central, 2015. Vol. 10, nr 1, s. 169-179
Nyckelord [en]
Policymaking, Policy analysis, Soft laws, Governance, Health policy, Implementation, Stakeholders, Advocacy Coalition Framework
Nationell ämneskategori
Folkhälsovetenskap, global hälsa, socialmedicin och epidemiologi Hälso- och sjukvårdsorganisation, hälsopolitik och hälsoekonomi
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-112702DOI: 10.1186/s13012-015-0359-1ISI: 000366455400001PubMedID: 26642783OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-112702DiVA, id: diva2:882225
Tillgänglig från: 2015-12-14 Skapad: 2015-12-14 Senast uppdaterad: 2018-06-07Bibliografiskt granskad
Ingår i avhandling
1. Mind the Gap: exploring evidence-based policymaking for improved preventive and mental health services in the Swedish health system
Öppna denna publikation i ny flik eller fönster >>Mind the Gap: exploring evidence-based policymaking for improved preventive and mental health services in the Swedish health system
2016 (Engelska)Doktorsavhandling, sammanläggning (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
Abstract [en]

Background: The challenges in the utilization of scientific findings in the fields of prevention and mental health are well documented. Scholars have found significant gaps between the knowledge available and the knowledge applied in healthcare. Studies have suggested that about half of the patients receive the recommended care for their medical condition. In order to address this gap, health systems at global, national, regional and local levels have made diverse efforts to facilitate the uptake of research for example through evidence-based health policy processes. In Sweden, government agencies and health policy actors such as the National Board of Health and Welfare support and control the health care system through evidence-based policies amongst other steering tools. The overall aim of this thesis is to explore evidence-based policy processes, and to further understand barriers to implementation of policies in the fields of preventive and mental health services.

Methods: A multiple case study approach was used, and data were collected from several sources. Qualitative content analysis methodology was used. Case 1 comprises the development and early implementation of national guidelines for methods of preventing disease managed by the National Board of Health and Welfare during 2007–2014. Case 2 covers the effort to improve health care for the older population that was undertaken through an agreement between the Swedish government and the Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions during 2009–2014. Case 3 involves an effort to implement an adapted version of a systematic review from the Swedish agency for health technology assessment and assessment of social services on treatment of depression in primary health care. Data was collected between 2007 and 2010.

In Paper 1, the policies from Case 1 and 2 were studied using a longitudinal, comparative case study approach. Data were collected through interviews, documents and observations. A conceptual model was developed based on prior frameworks. The model was used to organize and analyse the data. In Paper 2, the guideline development process (Case 1) was studied through interviews and the collection of documents. A prior framework on guideline quality was used in order to organize the data. Paper 3 investigated decision-making processes during guideline development using a longitudinal approach. Qualitative data were collected from questionnaires, documents and observations and analysed using conventional and summative content analysis. In Paper 4, the barriers to implementation were investigated through interviews and the collection of

documents. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis with a conceptual model to structure the analysis.

Results: The sources and procedures for policy formulation differed in Case 1 and 2, as did the approaches to promote the implementation of the policies. The policy processes were cyclical, and phases overlapped to a large degree. The policy actors intended to promote implementation, both during and after the policy formulation process.

The thesis shows variation in how the key policy actors defined and used research evidence in the policy processes. In addition, other types of knowledge (e.g. politics, context, experience) served as alternative or multiple sources to inform the health policies. The composition of sources that informed the policies changed over time in Cases 1 and B. During the policy formulation and implementation process, efforts to integrate research evidence with clinical experiences and values were associated with tension and recurrent dilemmas. On the local level (i.e. primary health care centres), barriers to implementation were found related to the innovation and among health professionals, patients, in social networks as well as in the organizational, economic and political contexts.

Conclusion: The concept of evidence holds a key position in terms of goals and means for knowledge based policymaking in the Swedish health system. Broad definitions of evidence – including research and non-research evidence - were requested and to various extents utilized by the policy actors in the studied cases. An explicit terminology and systematic, transparent methodology to define, identify, and assess also non-research evidence in policy processes would potentially strengthen the clarity and validity of these processes and also enhance policy implementation.

Particular determinants to implementation, such as the interventions characteristic, are to a considerable degree established early in the policy process, during agenda setting and policy formulation. This early phase offers unique opportunities to assess and build capacity, initiate and facilitate implementation.

Early analysis and considerations of target populations and contexts and other implementation determinants related to the specific policy scope (e.g. disease preventive guidelines) could enhance the forth-coming implementation of the policy.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Umeå: Umeå universitet, 2016. s. 82
Serie
Umeå University medical dissertations, ISSN 0346-6612 ; 1788
Nyckelord
Evidence-based policymaking, guidelines, implementation, prevention, depression
Nationell ämneskategori
Medicin och hälsovetenskap
Forskningsämne
folkhälsa
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-118179 (URN)978-91-7601-432-5 (ISBN)
Disputation
2016-04-08, Målpunkt R, E04, Umeå, 09:00 (Svenska)
Opponent
Handledare
Forskningsfinansiär
VINNOVA, A2008-025KempestiftelsernaForte, Forskningsrådet för hälsa, arbetsliv och välfärd, 2014-1552Jerringfonden
Tillgänglig från: 2016-03-17 Skapad: 2016-03-14 Senast uppdaterad: 2018-06-07Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

fulltext(1701 kB)372 nedladdningar
Filinformation
Filnamn FULLTEXT01.pdfFilstorlek 1701 kBChecksumma SHA-512
b179d58e5780fec761a8c55fd14147e05a01a714785a68b97dd0f7d7e758debe3fa49ffcd8520dfea5b399f4c149292f2b79d977163fc988473f7fdde1175073
Typ fulltextMimetyp application/pdf

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextPubMed

Personposter BETA

Richter-Sundberg, LindaNyström, Monica

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Richter-Sundberg, LindaNyström, Monica
Av organisationen
Epidemiologi och global hälsa
I samma tidskrift
Implementation Science
Folkhälsovetenskap, global hälsa, socialmedicin och epidemiologiHälso- och sjukvårdsorganisation, hälsopolitik och hälsoekonomi

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 372 nedladdningar
Antalet nedladdningar är summan av nedladdningar för alla fulltexter. Det kan inkludera t.ex tidigare versioner som nu inte längre är tillgängliga.

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 779 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf