umu.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Validity of reported energy expenditure and reported intake of energy, protein, sodium and potassium in rheumatoid arthritis patients in a dietary intervention study
Umeå universitet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Institutionen för kostvetenskap.
Umeå universitet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Institutionen för kostvetenskap.
2005 (Engelska)Ingår i: European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, ISSN 0954-3007, E-ISSN 1476-5640, Vol. 59, nr 2, s. 238-245Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Resurstyp
Text
Abstract [en]

Objectives: The aim of the study was to validate a diet history interview (DHI) method and a 3-day activity registration (AR) with biological markers.

Subjects and study design: The reported dietary intake of 33 rheumatoid arthritis patients (17 patients on a Mediterranean-type diet and 16 patients on a control diet) participating in a dietary intervention study was assessed using the DHI method. The total energy expenditure (TEE), estimated by a 3-day AR, was used to validate the energy intake (EI). For nine subjects the activity registration was also validated by means of the doubly labelled water (DLW) method. The excretion of nitrogen, sodium and potassium in 24-h urine samples was used to validate the intake of protein, sodium and potassium.

Results: There was no significant difference between the EI and the TEE estimated by the activity registration or between the intake of protein, sodium and potassium and their respective biological markers. However, in general, the AR underestimated the TEE compared to the DLW method. No significant differences were found between the subjects in the Mediterranean diet group and the control diet group regarding the relationship between the reported intakes and the biological markers.

Conclusion: The DHI could capture the dietary intake fairly well, and the dietary assessment was not biased by the dietary intervention. The AR showed a bias towards underestimation when compared to the DLW method. This illustrates the importance of valid biological markers.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
London: Nature Publishing Group, 2005. Vol. 59, nr 2, s. 238-245
Nyckelord [en]
rheumatoid arthritis, Mediterranean diet, diet history interview, biological markers, doubly labelled water, energy expenditure
Nationell ämneskategori
Näringslära
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-120437DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602064ISI: 000226690200011PubMedID: 15483633OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-120437DiVA, id: diva2:932802
Tillgänglig från: 2016-06-02 Skapad: 2016-05-16 Senast uppdaterad: 2018-06-07Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextPubMed

Personposter BETA

Hagfors, Linda

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Hagfors, Linda
Av organisationen
Institutionen för kostvetenskap
I samma tidskrift
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Näringslära

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 43 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf