Umeå universitets logga

umu.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Child Support Law in California and Sweden: a Comparison Across Welfare State Models
Umeå universitet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Juridiska institutionen.
2019 (Engelska)Doktorsavhandling, monografi (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
Abstract [en]

Ensuring just distribution of and adequate funding for children whose parents do not live together is a global legal challenge. It affects many families as well as every legal jurisdiction’s welfare state and family law.

This comparative study describes child support legal solutions in two jurisdictions, California (a liberal welfare state) and Sweden (a social democratic one). Analyzed are the similarities and differences in these states’ legal responses to the inequalities child support law functions to alleviate, and the implications for child support theory and practice in these and other jurisdictions.

Micro-comparative chapters demonstrate how the jurisdictions’ regulations differ by analyzing children’s rights and needs and parents’ duties and abilities to pay, each as defined in the child support law. Also compared are procedural laws enforcing child support rights and duties in private and public law cases.

Macro-comparative chapters draw a comparative portrait of two welfare state ideological and family law child support approaches, both aiming to reduce inequalities, in terms of how their child support laws and welfare states have defined and addressed the best interests of children and society at large.

Most of the differences in the laws and their interpretations are found to reflect the welfare state ideals of the two societies including their ideal models of the family and of individuals’ relationships to the state. Ideals for judicial and negotiated family law conflict resolution also play a significant role.

Analyses of the differences include comparison of the jurisdictions’ (1) histories, (2) legal principles and traditions, (3) gender equality ideals and realities and (4) income equality ideals and realities, all as related to legal child support rights and duties.

The study provides a better understanding of some of the weaknesses within these regulations, and also of the child support system design choices they represent. Weaknesses in child support laws arise not just from confusions over how to prioritize conflicting interests directly regulated by the legal rules, but also how to prioritize those interests given conflicting ideals of the state and the family, both between and within these societies. Despite the different ideals influencing both systems’ solutions, elements of each jurisdiction’s experience have potential to inform the other’s further development. 

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Umeå: Umeå University , 2019. , s. 614
Serie
Skrifter från Juridiska institutionen vid Umeå universitet, ISSN 1404-9198 ; 43
Nyckelord [en]
child support, family law, comparative law, comparative family law, Scandinavia, welfare state, California family law, Swedish family law, welfare law, financial consequences of divorce, solo parent households, sociology of the family, social democratic welfare state model, liberal welfare state model, child support reform, child support enforcement, child maintenance, United States child support, child support theory
Nyckelord [sv]
underhåll till barn, underhållsbidrag, underhållsstöd, välfärdsmodeller, Kalifornien, amerikansk familjerätt
Nationell ämneskategori
Juridik och samhälle Juridik (exklusive juridik och samhälle)
Forskningsämne
familjerätt
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-164288ISBN: 978-91-7855-134-7 (tryckt)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-164288DiVA, id: diva2:1362618
Disputation
2019-11-15, S213h, Samhällsvetarhuset / Social Sciences Building, Umeå, Sweden, 10:15 (Engelska)
Opponent
Handledare
Tillgänglig från: 2019-10-25 Skapad: 2019-10-21 Senast uppdaterad: 2019-10-22Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

fulltext(7691 kB)1383 nedladdningar
Filinformation
Filnamn FULLTEXT01.pdfFilstorlek 7691 kBChecksumma SHA-512
d8635524e60033614e61eda13c97e17d6c216c4095d9962bde982a471978c7632b7b4881df3e518c05614e010960f6ea95bc23447e2887df5d4cfd43e908f797
Typ fulltextMimetyp application/pdf
spikblad(383 kB)68 nedladdningar
Filinformation
Filnamn SPIKBLAD01.pdfFilstorlek 383 kBChecksumma SHA-512
4fd0251365fc1814126ff5e5e098ccf6aec9815c71051e777173cb47a20a7b66420ffd0bfbf668cebffc877ea950cad0a23a1bebbc1fdb77de7df1e60115584a
Typ spikbladMimetyp application/pdf

Person

Perry, Elizabeth Stuart

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Perry, Elizabeth Stuart
Av organisationen
Juridiska institutionen
Juridik och samhälleJuridik (exklusive juridik och samhälle)

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 1385 nedladdningar
Antalet nedladdningar är summan av nedladdningar för alla fulltexter. Det kan inkludera t.ex tidigare versioner som nu inte längre är tillgängliga.

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

isbn
urn-nbn
Totalt: 2100 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf