umu.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
DO PAIN CHARACTERISTICS GUIDE SELECTION FOR MULTIMODAL PAIN REHABILITATION?
Umeå universitet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för samhällsmedicin och rehabilitering, Rehabiliteringsmedicin. Department of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institutet and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Vise andre og tillknytning
2017 (engelsk)Inngår i: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, ISSN 1650-1977, E-ISSN 1651-2081, Vol. 49, nr 2, s. 161-169Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective: To determine whether self-reported pain measures are associated with selection for multimodal or multidisciplinary rehabilitation (MMR) and whether this selection is influenced by sex. Design: Cross-sectional cohort study. Subjects: A total of 1,226 women and 464 men with chronic pain conditions from 2 university hospitals. Methods: Drawing from the Swedish Quality Registry for Pain Rehabilitation (SQRP), data on pain, psychological symptoms, function, health, and activity/participation were collected. Multiple logistic regression was used to investigate association of pain measures with selection for MMR (no/yes) after multidisciplinary assessment. Covariates were: age, educational level, anxiety, depression, working status, and several pain measures. Results: High pain intensity in the previous week (odds ratio (OR) 0.92; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86-0.99) and high pain severity (Multidimensional Pain Inventory) (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.74-0.95) were negatively associated with selection for MMR, whereas higher number of pain quadrants was positively associated with selection for MMR. Similar results were obtained for women, but none of the measures was predictive for men. Conclusion: This practice-based study showed that higher scores on self-reported pain were not associated with selection for MMR, and in women there was a negative association for higher pain intensity and pain severity. Thus, other factors than pain determine whether patients are selected for MMR.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
FOUNDATION REHABILITATION INFORMATION , 2017. Vol. 49, nr 2, s. 161-169
Emneord [en]
multimodal treatment, multidisciplinary, chronic pain, gender, rehabilitation, primary healthcare
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-133457DOI: 10.2340/16501977-2176ISI: 000396799000009PubMedID: 28101558OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-133457DiVA, id: diva2:1088448
Tilgjengelig fra: 2017-04-12 Laget: 2017-04-12 Sist oppdatert: 2018-06-09bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

fulltext(380 kB)77 nedlastinger
Filinformasjon
Fil FULLTEXT01.pdfFilstørrelse 380 kBChecksum SHA-512
195e8e33d27c4e840e0426d84b84033710ecba92ad5857f3c1866ed2b59588dac7896ad1f692abf85b9df7ced25465ce9be457f39395d8499c6cdb987b1ff9e8
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstPubMed

Personposter BETA

Stålnacke, Britt-MarieStenberg, Gunilla

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Stålnacke, Britt-MarieStenberg, Gunilla
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 77 nedlastinger
Antall nedlastinger er summen av alle nedlastinger av alle fulltekster. Det kan for eksempel være tidligere versjoner som er ikke lenger tilgjengelige

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 402 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf