umu.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The role of students' scientific epistemic beliefs in computer-simulated problem solving
Umeå universitet, Teknisk-naturvetenskapliga fakulteten, Institutionen för naturvetenskapernas och matematikens didaktik. (DOLIS)ORCID-id: 0000-0002-5251-0374
Umeå universitet, Teknisk-naturvetenskapliga fakulteten, Institutionen för naturvetenskapernas och matematikens didaktik.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-1535-873X
Umeå universitet, Teknisk-naturvetenskapliga fakulteten, Institutionen för naturvetenskapernas och matematikens didaktik. (UmSER)
2019 (engelsk)Inngår i: Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, ISSN 0031-3831, E-ISSN 1470-1170, Vol. 63, nr 1, s. 124-144Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Research on how epistemic beliefs influence students' learning in different contexts is ambiguous. Given this, we have examined the relationships between students' scientific epistemic beliefs, their problem solving, and solutions in a constructionist computer-simulation in classical mechanics. The problem solving process and performance of 19 tenth grade students, with different scientific epistemic beliefs, was video recorded and inductively coded. Quantitative analysis revealed that different sets of epistemic beliefs were conducive to different aspects of students' problem solving process and outcomes.  Theoretically sophisticated beliefs were in general associated with logical strategies and high solution complexity. However, authority dependence was associated with high degree of adherence to instructions. Hence, there might not be a universal relationship between theoretical sophistication of students' epistemic beliefs and quality of learning outcomes. We suggest that the conduciveness to desired outcomes is a better measure of sophistication than theoretical non-contextualized a priori assumptions.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
London: Routledge, 2019. Vol. 63, nr 1, s. 124-144
Emneord [en]
Epistemic beliefs, problem solving, computer simulation, sophistication
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
pedagogiskt arbete
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-134192DOI: 10.1080/00313831.2017.1324907ISI: 000451601200008Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85020209220OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-134192DiVA, id: diva2:1091870
Prosjekter
DOLIS
Forskningsfinansiär
Swedish Research Council, 721-2013-2180Tilgjengelig fra: 2017-04-28 Laget: 2017-04-28 Sist oppdatert: 2019-10-16bibliografisk kontrollert
Inngår i avhandling
1. "Kunskap är vad du vet, och vet du inte kan du alltid googla!": elevers epistemic beliefs i naturvetenskaplig undervisningskontext
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>"Kunskap är vad du vet, och vet du inte kan du alltid googla!": elevers epistemic beliefs i naturvetenskaplig undervisningskontext
2018 (svensk)Doktoravhandling, med artikler (Annet vitenskapelig)
Abstract [en]

One important goal of science education is to help students develop an adequate understanding of what science is and how it is done. An understanding of science includes epistemic beliefs, that is, individuals’ beliefs about the nature of knowledge, how knowledge is constructed, and how knowledge can be justified. The epistemic beliefs are hypothesized to exist on a continuum ranging from naïve to sophisticated. Students’ epistemic beliefs and their epistemic cognition have been shown to influence various facets of learning. The overarching purpose of this thesis is to contribute to our knowledge and understanding of the role played by epistemic beliefs within the context of science education. The thesis intended to answer the following three general questions within a scientific context: 1) What prerequisites for drawing conclusions about epistemic beliefs are given based on the choice of questionnaire as a measurement method, including its design and content? 2) What is the relation between students’ epistemic beliefs and other phenomena that are important in learning situations? 3) What is the relation between students’ epistemic beliefs and their epistemic practices?

The studies used both quantitative and qualitative methods to examine students’ epistemic beliefs and epistemic practices. Data sources included questionnaires, video and screen observations, and semi-structured interviews. Participants in the studies were students in Grade 5-11 in Sweden and Germany. A series of four papers address the purpose of the thesis and respond to the three general questions. The first paper investigate relations between students’ epistemic beliefs and perceived classroom characteristics and whether differences could be found between the two countries. The second paper investigate the relative importance of epistemic beliefs dimensions for predicting achievement goals in Grade 5 through 11, in both a cross-sectional and a longitudinal study. The third paper explore the relationships between students’ scientific epistemic beliefs, their problemsolving process, and the quality of solutions produced by students. Finally, the fourth paper describe students’ epistemic practices of problem solving in science and their sense making in the moment, to deepen the understanding of the process of the students’ epistemic cognition. In relation to the first question, results indicate that the chosen measurement method for epistemic beliefs generates certain prerequisites for how epistemic beliefs can be understood and characterized. This in turn may have consequences when epistemic beliefs are studied in relation to, for example, other phenomena and epistemic practices. With regard to the second question, findings show that there are many relationships between epistemic beliefs and other phenomena, but also that they are in many cases context and/or situation dependent. Regarding the third question, the results point out that the relationship between students’ epistemic beliefs and their epistemic practices should be understood by how the students show, through words and actions, that they understand what the situation requires. Thus, there is no universal relationship between sophisticated epistemic beliefs and successful epistemic practices. It can be concluded that students’ epistemic beliefs do not exist in a vacuum without interacting with other phenomena, but that they depend on the surrounding context or situation in different ways. More studies that take into account different types of situations are required. This would in turn most likely also contribute to a better understanding of how students’ epistemic beliefs, epistemic cognition, and epistemic practices develop in relation to the surrounding teaching context.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Umeå: Institutionen för naturvetenskapernas och matematikens didaktik, Umeå universitet, 2018. s. 73
Serie
Doktorsavhandlingar i pedagogiskt arbete, ISSN 1650-8858 ; 83
Serie
Studies in science and technology education, ISSN 1652-5051 ; 103
Emneord
problemlösning, kunskapssyn, lärandemål, lärandemiljö, simulering, motivation
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
pedagogiskt arbete
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-147670 (URN)978-91-7601-887-3 (ISBN)
Disputas
2018-06-08, N320, Naturvetarhuset, Umeå, 09:00 (svensk)
Opponent
Veileder
Tilgjengelig fra: 2018-05-18 Laget: 2018-05-14 Sist oppdatert: 2018-12-19bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstScopus

Personposter BETA

Lindfors, MariaWinberg, MikaelBodin, Madelen

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Lindfors, MariaWinberg, MikaelBodin, Madelen
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 331 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf