umu.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Obstacles and possibilities for implementing SDM in Swedish mental health services: Supporting interactivity and participation
Umeå universitet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Institutionen för socialt arbete.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-0790-9386
2017 (engelsk)Konferansepaper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Fagfellevurdert)
Abstract [en]

Obstacles and possibilities for implementing SDM in Swedish mental health services; Supporting interactivity and participation.

Main author: David Rosenberg, Associate Professor, Department of Social Work, Umeå University, Sweden

Co authors: Katarina Grim, Ulla-Karin Schön & Petra Svedberg

 

Introduction Despite Swedish health care policy, which emphasizes patient participation in the planning of health care services, few programs have concrete methods for achieving this goal. Previous studies have shown that staff attitudes and systems which maintain power differentials, create obstacles for achieving participation despite methods such as SDM.

The purpose of the study was to explore implementing SDM with an interactive digital decision tool, designed for users in community mental health services in Sweden. The tool was specifically developed, in collaborative research with users, to overcome disempowering experiences as they attempt to participate in treatment decisions.

Method

A process evaluation design (Moore et al. 2015) was utilized in order to investigate obstacles and possibilities for a structured intervention to facilitate participation in decision making. The design utilized in the study included collecting qualitative and quantitative data focused on three identified evaluation components; Context, Implementation and Mechanism of impact.

Results Staff considered that SDM was most appropriate for formal treatment planning and that the use of the digital decision tool, which enabled interactive communication between staff and users, did support the user to be prepared for decisions, as well as helping staff to stay focused on user wishes.

SDM was most often used voluntarily by each staff member, based on their experience and attitude, rather than a common practice for the service. Another barrier concerned capacity, with staff sometimes feeling they did not have formal power regarding treatment planning decisions, and expressing doubt as to the patient's willingness and ability to participate in decisions.

Discussion

The results suggest that contextual barriers to implementing shared decision making can be addressed by utilizing interactive decision tools which concretely structure the interaction between users and staff and are connected to formally required treatment planning processes that are essential for user participation.

Key words: Implementation, participation, Shared Decision making Preferred conference theme: 1. Recovery for different groups

Oral presentation

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2017.
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-141420OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-141420DiVA, id: diva2:1154483
Konferanse
Refocus on Recovery 2017
Tilgjengelig fra: 2017-11-02 Laget: 2017-11-02 Sist oppdatert: 2018-06-09

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Personposter BETA

Rosenberg, David

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Rosenberg, David
Av organisasjonen

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric

urn-nbn
Totalt: 162 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf