Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Investigating welfare regime typologies: Paradoxes, pitfalls and potentialities in comparative social work research
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Social Work. (FACSK)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1940-1811
University of Sheffield, Department of Sociological Studies. (FACSK)
Universitetet i Stavanger, Institutionen för socialt arbete. (FACSK)
2018 (English)In: Social Policy and Society, ISSN 1474-7464, E-ISSN 1475-3073, Vol. 17, no 4, p. 665-677Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The article reviews the relevance and methodological utility of welfare regime typologies for the study of professional sense-making in social work with families. Focus groups were carried out with social workers in European and Latin American countries representing four different policy regimes. A case vignette was used to elicit social workers’ descriptions of how welfare policy may influence how they understand their work task and the notion of family. The research team identified methodological challenges of general relevance in similar policy-practice studies. There were paradoxes in terms of homogeneity on the regime level vs. heterogeneity within and between national services. Pitfalls appeared in the selection of regime-typical cases, language/cultural barriers, and in deciding organisational level. The article shows that welfare typologies have potentialities in that they may provide a helpful analytical basis for theoretical and practical reasoning in which syntheses between policy and practice can be explored, discussed and challenged.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Cambridge University Press, 2018. Vol. 17, no 4, p. 665-677
Keywords [en]
welfare regimes, family policy, social work, comparative methodology, vignette study
National Category
Social Work
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-151323DOI: 10.1017/S1474746418000167ISI: 000443420300011Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85048765713OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-151323DiVA, id: diva2:1244248
Projects
FACSKAvailable from: 2018-08-31 Created: 2018-08-31 Last updated: 2023-03-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Nygren, Lennart

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nygren, Lennart
By organisation
Department of Social Work
In the same journal
Social Policy and Society
Social Work

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 380 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf