umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Religion and spirituality as predictors of patient-reported outcomes in adults with congenital heart disease around the globe
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: International Journal of Cardiology, ISSN 0167-5273, E-ISSN 1874-1754, Vol. 274, p. 93-99Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Aims: Religion and spirituality can be resources for internal strength and resilience, and may assist with managing life's challenges. Prior studies have been undertaken primarily in countries with high proportions of religious/spiritual people. We investigated (i) whether being religious/spiritual is an independent predictor of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in a large international sample of adults with congenital heart disease, (ii) whether the individual level of importance of religion/spirituality is an independent predictor for PROs, and (iii) if these relationships are moderated by the degree to which the respective countries are religious or secular.

Methods and results: APPROACH-IS was a cross-sectional study, in which 4028 patients from 15 countries were enrolled. Patients completed questionnaires to measure perceived health status; psychological functioning; health behaviors; and quality of life. Religion/spirituality was measured using three questions: Do you consider yourself religious or spiritual?; How important is religion, spirituality, or faith in your life?; and If religious, to what religion do you belong?. The country level of religiosity/secularity was appraised using data from the Gallup Poll 2005-2009. General linear mixed models, adjusting for patient characteristics and country differences were applied. Overall, 49.2% of patients considered themselves to be religious/spiritual. Being religious/spiritual and considering religion/spirituality as important in one's life was positively associated with quality of life, satisfaction with life and health behaviors. However, among patients living in more secular countries, religion/spirituality was negatively associated with physical and mental health.

Conclusion: Religiosity/spirituality is an independent predictor for some PROs, but has differential impact across countries. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Ireland: Elsevier, 2019. Vol. 274, p. 93-99
Keywords [en]
Cross-cultural comparison, Religion, Heart defects, congenital, Patient-reported outcomes
National Category
Religious Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-154025DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.07.103ISI: 000450293300021PubMedID: 30077534OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-154025DiVA, id: diva2:1272967
Funder
Swedish Heart Lung Foundation, 20130607Available from: 2018-12-20 Created: 2018-12-20 Last updated: 2018-12-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Johansson, Bengt

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Moons, PhilipDezutter, JessieJohansson, BengtFernandes, Susan M.
By organisation
Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine
In the same journal
International Journal of Cardiology
Religious Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 38 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf