umu.sePublications
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A struggling collaborative process: revisiting the woodland key habitat concept in Swedish forests
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6845-5525
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7674-6197
Department of Wildlife, Fish and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Umeå, Sweden.
Department of Forestry Management, Forestry Research Institute of Sweden (Skogsforsk), Uppsala.
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, ISSN 0282-7581, E-ISSN 1651-1891Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

The term woodland key habitat (WKH) was launched in Sweden in 1990. Definitions for the concept have changed over the years, and today the WKH concept and its application are issues of debate in Sweden. Consequently, the Swedish Forestry Agency (SFA) initiated a collaborative process including forest stakeholders with the purpose to clarify the application and develop the inventory methodology of WKH. We have studied, by means of interviews and observations, participant perceptions of how endogenous and exogenous factors affect the collaborative process. During our research, we identified three game changers: the pause in WKH registration in northwestern Sweden that caused several participants to drop out of the process; budget allocations for new nationwide WKH inventories that put the process on hold; and formal instructions from the government that came nine months later and essentially re-initiated the collaborative process. Altogether, this not only affected the participants’ abilities, understanding and willingness to participate, but also the overall legitimacy of the process – indicating the difficulty of conducting policy development in collaborative form, especially when it is highly politicized since it impact on the participants’ anticipation of the process and its end results.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis Group, 2019.
Keywords [en]
evaluation, collaboration, woodland key habitat, inventories, forest, Sweden
National Category
Social Sciences Interdisciplinary Sociology (excluding Social Work, Social Psychology and Social Anthropology) Human Geography
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-163501DOI: 10.1080/02827581.2019.1674916OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-163501DiVA, id: diva2:1356213
Projects
Future ForestsAvailable from: 2019-10-01 Created: 2019-10-01 Last updated: 2019-10-09

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1580 kB)11 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1580 kBChecksum SHA-512
cbad3a671586e7edf4376451601eff6e95fdd12b2cec41a5903c241ff60b61c901fce64fc27ecf82877704cb8c20bd288e29d6730c00aa0c1c55c2cc9c7cb649
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Bjärstig, ThereseSandström, Camilla

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bjärstig, ThereseSandström, Camilla
By organisation
Department of Political Science
In the same journal
Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research
Social Sciences InterdisciplinarySociology (excluding Social Work, Social Psychology and Social Anthropology)Human Geography

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 11 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 73 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf