umu.sePublications
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Association of Physician Education and Feedback on Hypertension Management With Patient Blood Pressure and Hypertension Control
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Global Health. Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0556-1483
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1633-2179
Show others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: JAMA Network Open, ISSN 2574-3805, Vol. 3, no 1, article id e1918625Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Importance: Elevated systolic blood pressure (SBP) is the most important risk factor for premature death worldwide. However, hypertension detection and control rates continue to be suboptimal.

Objective: To assess the association of education and feedback to primary care physicians with population-level SBP and hypertension control rates.

Design, Setting, and Participants: This pooled series of 108 population-based cohort studies involving 283 079 patients used data from primary care centers in 2 counties (Västerbotten and Södermanland) in Sweden from 2001 to 2009. Participants were individuals aged 18 years or older who had their blood pressure (BP) measured and recorded in either county during the intervention period. All analyses were performed in February 2019.

Exposures: An intervention comprising education and feedback for primary care physicians in Västerbotten County (intervention group) compared with usual care in Södermanland County (control group).

Main Outcomes and Measures: Difference in mean SBP levels between counties and likelihood of hypertension control in the intervention county compared with the control county during 24 months of follow-up.

Results: A total of 136 541 unique individuals (mean [SD] age at inclusion, 64.6 [16.1] years; 57.0% female; mean inclusion BP, 142/82 mm Hg) in the intervention county were compared with 146 538 individuals (mean [SD] age at inclusion, 65.7 [15.9] years; 58.3% female; mean inclusion BP, 144/80 mm Hg) in the control county. Mean SBP difference between counties during follow-up, adjusted for inclusion BP and other covariates, was 1.1 mm Hg (95% CI, 1.0-1.1 mm Hg). Hypertension control improved by 8.4 percentage points, and control was achieved in 37.8% of participants in the intervention county compared with 29.4% in the control county (adjusted odds ratio, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.29-1.31). Differences between counties increased during the intervention period and were more pronounced in participants with higher SBP at inclusion. Results were consistent across all subgroups.

Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that SBP levels and hypertension control rates in a county population may be improved by educational approaches directed at physicians and other health care workers. Similar strategies may be adopted to reinforce the implementation of clinical practice guidelines for hypertension management.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
American Medical Association , 2020. Vol. 3, no 1, article id e1918625
National Category
General Practice Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-167169DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18625PubMedID: 31913490OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-167169DiVA, id: diva2:1384509
Available from: 2020-01-10 Created: 2020-01-10 Last updated: 2020-01-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1898 kB)12 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1898 kBChecksum SHA-512
769bcc68f257bea35e07c270e9e8392939e8fefcc7bc58bf28e72a50843c581a0df20ec783e1e172022b84cc9628462b0be2db0be5017566e9663537a4744d3d
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Brunström, MattiasNg, NawiDahlström, JohnLindholm, Lars H.Lönnberg, GöranNorberg, MargaretaNyström, LennarthWeinehall, LarsCarlberg, Bo

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Brunström, MattiasNg, NawiDahlström, JohnLindholm, Lars H.Lönnberg, GöranNorberg, MargaretaNyström, LennarthWeinehall, LarsCarlberg, Bo
By organisation
Department of Public Health and Clinical MedicineDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health
General PracticePublic Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 12 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 63 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf