umu.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Subjective probability intervals: how to reduce overconfidence by interval evaluation
Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Umeå universitet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Institutionen för psykologi.
Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
2004 (engelsk)Inngår i: Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition, ISSN 0278-7393, E-ISSN 1939-1285, Vol. 30, nr 6, s. 1167-1175Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Format dependence implies that assessment of the same subjective probability distribution produces different conclusions about over- or underconfidence depending on the assessment format. In 2 experiments, the authors demonstrate that the overconfidence bias that occurs when participants produce intervals for an uncertain quantity is almost abolished when they evaluate the probability that the same intervals include the quantity. The authors successfully apply a method for adaptive adjustment of probability intervals as a debiasing tool and discuss a tentative explanation in terms of a naive sampling model. According to this view, people report their experiences accurately, but they are naive in that they treat both sample proportion and sample dispersion as unbiased estimators, yielding small bias in probability evaluation but strong bias in interval production.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Washington: The American psychological association , 2004. Vol. 30, nr 6, s. 1167-1175
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
psykologi
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-2553DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.6.1167OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-2553DiVA, id: diva2:140739
Tilgjengelig fra: 2007-09-17 Laget: 2007-09-17 Sist oppdatert: 2018-06-09bibliografisk kontrollert
Inngår i avhandling
1. A naïve sampling model of intuitive confidence intervals
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>A naïve sampling model of intuitive confidence intervals
2007 (engelsk)Doktoravhandling, med artikler (Annet vitenskapelig)
Abstract [en]

A particular field in research on judgment and decision making (JDM) is concerned with realism of confidence in one’s knowledge. An interesting finding is the so-called format dependence effect, which implies that assessment of the same probability distribution generates different conclusions about over- or underconfidence depending on the assessment format. In particular, expressing a belief about some unknown continuous quantity (e.g., a stock value) in the form of an intuitive confidence interval is severely prone to overconfidence as compared to expressing the belief as an assessment of a probability judgment. This thesis gives a tentative account of this finding in terms of a Naïve Sampling Model, which assumes that people accurately describe their available information stored in memory, but they are naïve in the sense that they treat sample properties as proper estimators of population properties (Study 1). The effect of this naivety is directly investigated empirically in Study 2. A prediction that short-term memory is a constraining factor for sample size in judgment, suggesting that experience per se does not eliminate overconfidence is investigated and verified in Study 3. Age-related increments in overconfidence were observed with intuitive confidence interval but not for probability judgment (Study 4). This thesis suggests that no cognitive processing bias (e.g., Tversky & Kahneman, 1974) over and above naivety is needed to understand and explain the overconfidence “bias” with intuitive confidence interval and hence the format dependence effect.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Umeå: Psykologi, 2007. s. 63
Emneord
overconfidence, subjective probability, sampling model, short-term memory, age-differences.
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-1354 (URN)978-91-7264-368-0 (ISBN)
Disputas
2007-10-05, Bt102, Beteendevetarhuset, Umeå Universitet, Umeå, 10:00
Opponent
Veileder
Tilgjengelig fra: 2007-09-17 Laget: 2007-09-17 Sist oppdatert: 2018-06-09bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fullteksthttp://content.apa.org/journals/xlm/30/6/1167

Personposter BETA

Hansson, Patrik

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Hansson, Patrik
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 468 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf