umu.sePublications
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The influence of geographical and clinical factors on decisions to use surgical mesh in operations for pelvic organ prolapse
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, ISSN 1478-3363, E-ISSN 1478-3371Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

Background: Surgical mesh can reinforce damaged biological structures in operations for genital organ prolapse. The first mesh products were cleared by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2002. In contrast to stringent requirements for the development of pharmaceuticals, there was never a systematic scientific evaluation of mesh products.

Purpose: We examined whether Swedish gynecological surgeons have transformed increasing amounts of scientific information into common learning, resulting in a convergent and consistent pattern of mesh use.

Methods: Based on data from the Swedish National Quality Register of Gynecological Surgery, registered from 2010 to 2016, we examined changes in decisions to use mesh in a largely uniform group of 2864 recurrence patients operated by 455 surgeons, where surgical mesh was used in 1435 patients (50.1%). By means of logistic regression, we explained decisions to use mesh by clinical risk factors, an FDA warning, year of surgery, type of hospital, and geographical factors.

Results: The use of mesh in Sweden varied extensively, by a range from 7% to 93% on county level. These disparities were maintained between the entities over time. Different groups of decision makers had drawn different conclusions from the available information. Geography was the most important parameter in explaining decisions to use mesh.

Conclusion: Mounting scientific information has had no measurable impact on decision-making, and has not led to a more consistent decision pattern. Early decisions have led to obvious ‘communities of practice’ at county and region levels. Swedish surgeons, unaltered through 7 years, have made mesh decisions in a clearly biased fashion, highly influenced by geographical factors, and with no measurable change towards national consensus.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Routledge, 2018.
Keywords [en]
health care, decision-making, quality assurance
National Category
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-169126DOI: 10.1080/14783363.2018.1452610Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85044358421OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-169126DiVA, id: diva2:1416047
Available from: 2020-03-20 Created: 2020-03-20 Last updated: 2020-03-20

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1040 kB)13 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1040 kBChecksum SHA-512
f073ad83e9aedd08b89a2d946da0743a9b17a48c51314ae9fe8c740cf0a6882ad990742a9c70152c4e1c1650f5df89a321c80ba334b06eacf65b26f61692d503
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Nüssler, Emil K.Nüssler, EmilLöfgren, Mats

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nüssler, Emil K.Nüssler, EmilLöfgren, Mats
By organisation
Obstetrics and Gynecology
In the same journal
Total Quality Management and Business Excellence
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 13 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 28 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf