umu.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Informed consent for clinical education: randomized study of two different strategies at a urology surgery
Umeå universitet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för folkhälsa och klinisk medicin.
Umeå universitet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för kirurgisk och perioperativ vetenskap, Urologi och andrologi.
Umeå universitet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för klinisk vetenskap, Psykiatri.
Department of Learning, Informatics, Management & Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
2004 (engelsk)Inngår i: Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, ISSN 0036-5599, E-ISSN 1651-2065, Vol. 38, nr 6, s. 490-494Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective: To study whether or not the provision of written information in advance might influence patients' inclination to participate in the clinical education of medical students at a urology surgery.

Material and Methods: A total of 169 outpatients referred to the urological surgery were randomly allocated either to receive information in advance or not, together with a notice of appointment that all patients receive by mail ≈2 weeks prior to their visit. Patients in the experimental group received a written information letter in advance about medical education, whereas the control patients did not receive any written information, according to the standard procedure of the surgery. The patients were not told about the study until afterwards and neither the doctors/teachers nor the students knew in advance to which group a certain patient had been allocated. At the end of the visit the patients were asked to complete a questionnaire.

Results: The randomization procedure resulted in 83 patients being informed in advance and 86 control patients not being informed. Forty‐two patients completed the questionnaire: 19 in the experimental group and 23 in the control group. There was no difference between the groups with regard to reasons for dropping out.

Conclusions: This study indicates that the provision of information in advance does not negatively influence patients' inclination to participate in the clinical training of medical students.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2004. Vol. 38, nr 6, s. 490-494
Emneord [en]
Double-Blind Method, Education; Medical, Female, Humans, Informed Consent/psychology, Male, Middle Aged, Physician-Patient Relations, Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, Students; Medical/psychology, Urologic Diseases/*surgery, Urologic Surgical Procedures/*education/psychology, clinical training, informed consent, medical education, medical students, randomized trial, urology
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-14220DOI: 10.1080/00365590410015876PubMedID: 15841784OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-14220DiVA, id: diva2:153891
Tilgjengelig fra: 2007-05-24 Laget: 2007-05-24 Sist oppdatert: 2018-06-09bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstPubMedhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=15841784&dopt=Citation

Personposter BETA

Sandlund, Mikael

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Sandlund, Mikael
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 125 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf