Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Forest Restoration: Do Site Selection and Restoration Practices Follow Ecological Criteria? A Case Study in Sweden
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2372-1551
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6075-9890
2021 (English)In: Forests, E-ISSN 1999-4907, Vol. 12, no 8, article id 988Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The speed with which restoration will, or can, be accomplished depends on the initial state and location of the sites. However, many factors can undermine the process of choosing sites that are deemed the best ecological choice for restoration. Little attention has been paid to whether site selection follows ecological criteria and how this may affect restoration success. We used habitat inventory data to investigate whether ecological criteria for site selection and restoration have been followed, focusing on restoration for the white-backed woodpecker (Dendrocopos leucotos B.) in Sweden. In our study region, which is situated in an intensively managed forest landscape with dense and young stands dominated by two coniferous species, purely ecological criteria would entail that sites that are targeted for restoration would (1) initially be composed of older and more deciduous trees than the surrounding landscape, and (2) be at a scale relevant for the species. Furthermore, restoration should lead to sites becoming less dense and less dominated by coniferous trees after restoration, which we investigated as an assessment of restoration progress. To contextualize the results, we interviewed people involved in the restoration efforts on site. We show that although the first criterion for ecological site selection was largely met, the second was not. More research is needed to assess the motivations of actors taking part in restoration efforts, as well as how they interlink with public efforts. This would allow us to identify possible synergies that can benefit restoration efforts.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
MDPI, 2021. Vol. 12, no 8, article id 988
Keywords [en]
Dendrocopos leucotos, forest restoration, forestry, site selection, project management, public-private partnerships
National Category
Ecology Forest Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-186929DOI: 10.3390/f12080988ISI: 000690558600001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85112486575OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-186929DiVA, id: diva2:1588084
Part of project
Ecosystem restoration in policy and practice: restore, develop, adapt, Swedish Research Council Formas
Funder
Swedish Research Council Formas, 2009-450Available from: 2021-08-26 Created: 2021-08-26 Last updated: 2024-07-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(3213 kB)347 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 3213 kBChecksum SHA-512
4e3ad1faceaf8777ae010c0f4e2ea7e0873f863d24bf5b0d1e5096f789df05cb38e3e933e4490d1e67531b43e39dadc4c5ecf52433511c76cce547c1c6c47e86
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Zachrisson, AnnaPolvi, Lina E.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hof, Anouschka R.Zachrisson, AnnaPolvi, Lina E.
By organisation
Department of Political ScienceDepartment of Ecology and Environmental Sciences
In the same journal
Forests
EcologyForest Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 347 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 234 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf