PET/MR versus PET/CT for locoregional staging of oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer
2023 (English)In: Acta Radiologica, ISSN 0284-1851, E-ISSN 1600-0455, Vol. 64, no 5, p. 1865-1872Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Background: The value of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for TN staging in head and neck cancer (HNC) has been proven in numerous studies. A few studies have investigated the value of FDG-PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the staging of HNC; the combined results indicate potential for FDG-PET/MRI, but the scientific evidence remains weak.
Purpose: To compare performance of FDG-PET/CT and FDG-PET/MRI for locoregional staging in patients with oropharyngeal carcinomas.
Material and Methods: Two radiologists independently of each other retrospectively reviewed primary pre-therapeutic FDG-PET/CT and FDG-PET/MRI examinations from 40 individuals with oropharyngeal carcinomas. TN stage and primary tumor size were noted. The results were compared between observers and modalities and against TN stage set at a multidisciplinary conference.
Results: For nodal staging, PET/MRI had slightly higher specificity and accuracy than PET/CT for the most experienced observer. Both methods demonstrated excellent sensitivity (≥ 0.97 and 1.00, respectively), as well as high negative predictive values (≥ 0.95 and 1.00, respectively). No significant differences were found for tumor staging or measurement of maximum tumor diameter. There was a weak agreement (κ = 0.35–0.49) between PET/CT and PET/MRI for T and N stages for both observers. Inter-observer agreement was higher for PET/MRI than for PET/CT, both for tumor staging (κ = 0.57 vs. 0.35) and nodal staging (κ = 0.69 vs. 0.55). The agreement between observers was comparable to the agreement between methods.
Conclusion: PET/MRI may be a viable alternative to PET/CT for locoregional staging (TN staging) and assessment of maximal tumor diameter in oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sage Publications, 2023. Vol. 64, no 5, p. 1865-1872
Keywords [en]
18F-FDG, cancer staging, Head and neck cancer, positron emission tomography/computed tomography, positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging
National Category
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-202001DOI: 10.1177/02841851221140668ISI: 000893509800001PubMedID: 36464816Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85144223158OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-202001DiVA, id: diva2:1722515
Funder
Swedish Cancer SocietyUmeå UniversityRegion Västerbotten, RV-9409212022-12-292022-12-292023-07-13Bibliographically approved