Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Planned maintenance
A system upgrade is planned for 24/9-2024, at 12:00-14:00. During this time DiVA will be unavailable.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty versus descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty for fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy: a national registry-based comparison
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Ophthalmology.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1292-1945
Division of Ophthalmology and Vision, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, St. Erik Eye Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Ophthalmology.
2023 (English)In: Ophthalmology, ISSN 0161-6420, E-ISSN 1549-4713, Vol. 130, no 12, p. 1248-1257Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose: To compare the outcome between posterior lamellar corneal transplant procedures for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy, taking preoperative patient characteristics in consideration. Surgical methods compared were Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), and DSAEK with concomitant cataract surgery (phacoemulsification plus DSAEK).

Design: Registry-based study with propensity score matching. Participants: One thousand six hundred seventy-seven patients from all Swedish corneal transplantation units treated from 2012 through 2019.

Methods: All patients undergoing endothelial keratoplasty performed from 2012 through 2019 with completed 2-year follow-up data reported to The Swedish Corneal Transplant Register were included, totaling 1677 patients. Three comparable groups (DMEK, DSAEK, and phacoemulsification plus DSAEK) with 216 patients in each group were generated with propensity score matching based on preoperative visual acuity, age, sex, year of surgery, and preoperative risk factors such as inflammation, vascularization, and glaucoma.

Main Outcome Measures: Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at the 2-year follow-up, frequency of graft dislocation, graft rejection episodes, and graft failure within 2 years including primary graft failure.

Results: The preoperative corneal status was affected more severely in the DSAEK group before matching. In the matched groups, the median BCVA 2 years after surgery was 0.1 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) in both the DMEK and the phacoemulsification plus DSAEK groups and 0.15 logMAR in the DSAEK group (P = 0.001). The frequency of graft dislocation was higher among the patients undergoing phacoemulsification plus DSAEK, but the frequency of graft failure and primary graft failure was higher in the DMEK group.

Conclusions: Visual acuity improved in most patients (90%) with all 3 surgical methods. However, DMEK and phacoemulsification plus DSAEK reached higher levels of visual acuity 2 years after surgery, and phacoemulsification plus DSAEK was superior considering graft survival rate. All 3 surgical procedures showed both strengths and weaknesses, suggesting that the choice of surgical method should be individualized, taking into consideration not only the cornea, but each patient's complete medical status as well as the entire course of postoperative medical care.

Financial Disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2023. Vol. 130, no 12, p. 1248-1257
Keywords [en]
Cataract surgery, Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty, Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty, Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy, Register-based study
National Category
Ophthalmology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-214287DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2023.07.024PubMedID: 37517576Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85169845830OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-214287DiVA, id: diva2:1795846
Funder
Umeå UniversityRegion VästerbottenSwedish Society of MedicineStiftelsen Kronprinsessan Margaretas arbetsnämnd för synskadadeAvailable from: 2023-09-11 Created: 2023-09-11 Last updated: 2024-08-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(909 kB)48 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 909 kBChecksum SHA-512
6ee39a44596a18b623613ef0f7369bd7e87fa5d781d2acecd21c7801cb1b66468abad0cdbf08c58e6c94cf0b4996a474720e058ec584512bfdfca72634de50ac
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Viberg, AndreasByström, Berit

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Viberg, AndreasByström, Berit
By organisation
Ophthalmology
In the same journal
Ophthalmology
Ophthalmology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 91 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 252 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf