Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Assessing affective valence and activation in resistance training with the feeling scale and the felt arousal scale: a systematic review
Faculty of Physical Education and Sport (ULHT), Lusófona University, Lisbon, Portugal; Research Center in Sport, Physical Education, Exercise and Health (CIDEFES), Lisbon, Portugal.
Quality of Life Research Center (CIEQV), Santarém, Portugal.
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1807-7837
Faculty of Physical Education and Sport (ULHT), Lusófona University, Lisbon, Portugal; Research Center in Sport, Physical Education, Exercise and Health (CIDEFES), Lisbon, Portugal.
2023 (English)In: PLOS ONE, E-ISSN 1932-6203, Vol. 18, no 11, article id e0294529Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Evidence suggests affective responses to exercise can influence exercise adherence. However, there is a limited understanding of how and when to measure core affect in resistance training. As such, the objective of this systematic review was to analyze how the Feeling Scale and/or the Felt Arousal Scale have been used in resistance training to assess core affect. Focus was given to the contextual feasibility, timing, and frequency of assessment. A search in PubMed, SPORTDiscus, and PsycINFO databases was conducted (last search date July, 2022) with the purpose of including experimental and non-experimental studies, utilizing the Feeling Scale and/or the Felt Arousal Scale in resistance training, and focused on apparently healthy individuals of any age. Twenty-seven studies (N = 718 participants) published between 2009-2022 were qualitatively analyzed. Both scales appeared to be able to detect core affect within a wide array of intensities, ages, and equipment. As for the timing and frequency of measurement, no apparent standardization was evident. The use of the Feeling Scale, the Felt Arousal Scale, or both, to measure core affect appears to be feasible in resistance training practices. However, a lack of methodological background raises concerns regarding the quality of previous studies' assessments and comparisons of results across studies.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2023. Vol. 18, no 11, article id e0294529
National Category
Sport and Fitness Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-217430DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294529PubMedID: 37972201Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85177445769OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-217430DiVA, id: diva2:1816560
Available from: 2023-12-04 Created: 2023-12-04 Last updated: 2023-12-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(815 kB)56 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 815 kBChecksum SHA-512
24967ef898a15afd601a7d377c237789b84e702999b5bf0354c87bdeebd8c31fb180f033a3637c8a36be5066a746623dc355319b450208ebcdfec71e857d3db6
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Davis, Paul A.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Davis, Paul A.
By organisation
Department of Psychology
In the same journal
PLOS ONE
Sport and Fitness Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 56 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 406 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf