umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The pivotal nature of award methods in green public procurement
2011 (English)In: Environmental Economics, ISSN 1998-6041, E-ISSN 1998-605X, Vol. 2, no 3, p. 64-73Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Internationally there is a strong trend of implementing Green Public Procurement (GPP), and it is seen as an environmental policy tool. By its purchasing power public authorities are via environmental concerns in procurement believed to have the power of stimulating firms to reduce emissions, be resource efficient, and developing products proper in line with a sustainable society. In allocating public contracts authorities use award methods and scoring rules. This paper discusses the procedure of allocating contracts when GPP is applied. Departing from previous research on this topic the paper explicitly discusses the pivotal role of using suitable award methods and scoring rules for GPP to functioning as an efficient environmental policy tool. It is most important that GPP matches the preferences of the society (e.g., a municipality or a state authority). Assuming that GPP can be used as an environmental policy tool, the authors present general guidelines for choosing an efficient award method and scoring rule in perspective of welfare and sustainability.The necessity of such guidelines cannot be emphasized enough, partly because previous scientific literature on the topic is very scarce and partly, which is most serious, empirical data (Swedish public procurement data) indicate that scoring rules that violates necessary conditions for efficient outcomes are commonly used. It cannot be ruled out that this unfortunate circumstance causes the society substantial costs. In this perspective it is also noteworthy that Sweden is regarded as a frontrunner in successfully implementing GPP (Kahlenborn et al., 2011).

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Business Perspectives , 2011. Vol. 2, no 3, p. 64-73
Keywords [en]
public procurement, scoring rules, award methods, environmental policy
National Category
Economics
Research subject
Economics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-51003OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-51003DiVA, id: diva2:473378
Projects
Grön offentlig upphandling,: Ett effektivt miljöpolitiskt styrmedel?
Funder
Swedish Research Council
Note

USBESDA

Available from: 2012-01-05 Created: 2012-01-05 Last updated: 2019-01-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

URL

Authority records BETA

Lundberg, SofiaMarklund, Per-Olov

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lundberg, SofiaMarklund, Per-Olov
In the same journal
Environmental Economics
Economics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 267 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf