umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Brottsoffer i rättskedjan: en rättsvetenskaplig studie av förhållandet mellan brottsoffers rättigheter och rättsväsendets skyldigheter
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1184-1385
2013 (Swedish)Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

In recent decades the Swedish legislature has increasingly focused on the treatment of victims of crime and the information they receive. Victimology research has also shown the importance of treating victims with respect and of keeping them informed of their rights and the progress of their case throughout the process. The requirements thus set have to be met by all judicial actors, which presuppose a level of cooperation among them. Cooperation therefore constitutes one way of meeting victims' needs. In the current study these three factors; information, good treatment and cooperation, are referred to as victims’ rights.

          Studies have shown that victims experience shortcomings in the legal process regarding information and treatment. The causes of these shortcomings can be multiple, but from a legal point of view, however, the issue raises the question of whether there may be potential legal difficulties involved in incorporating adequate information and good treatment of crime victims into the judicial process. The purpose of this thesis is to study and analyse victims’ rights in the judicial process. As they are not without a legal context, these victims’ rights are analysed in relation to other legislation, principles and requirements that govern the functions of the judicial system, such as the duty of the police, prosecutors and courts to act objectively, conduct their work independently, and run an efficient legal process. The main question is whether the incorporation of victims’ rights conflicts with other rules and legal principles.   

     The study concludes, inter alia, that victims’ rights concerning the treatment of victims and coordination of the work with victims is vaguely regulated and the intended meaning of the requirements are not clear, which may lead to problems when these requirements are incorporated into the justice system. Regarding information, treatment of victims and coordination and cooperation, little guidance is given about how to incorporate this at the local level. Informational requirements are expressed more clearly in the legislation, but how and to what extent information to victims should be given can still be a matter of interpretation on the part of the actors. The existence of local differences is therefore likely, which can affect the actual support that individual victims gain access to. The legislature could choose to further clarify and elaborate upon how victims’ rights issues relate to other aspects of the judicial process, how priorities or balancing of interests should be handled as well as to reveal the underlying motives for such considerations. Such clarification could possibly increase the consistency of the incorporation of victims’ rights, and transform abstract goals into concrete actions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Iustus förlag, 2013. , 258 p.
Series
Skrifter från Juridiska institutionen vid Umeå universitet, ISSN 1404-9198 ; 28
Keyword [en]
Victims’ rights, victims of crime, criminal process, judicial process, justice system, police, prosecutor, courts, policy
Keyword [sv]
Brottsoffers rättigheter, brottsoffer, rättsprocess, rättskedjan, rättsväsendet, polis, åklagare, domstol, policy
National Category
Law
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-79971ISBN: 978-91-7678-856-1 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-79971DiVA: diva2:645577
Public defence
2013-09-27, Samhällsvetarhuset, Hörsal C, Umeå universitet, Umeå, 13:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2013-09-06 Created: 2013-09-04 Last updated: 2016-03-22Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2900 kB)263 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2900 kBChecksum SHA-512
016499cff4a191e82fef58db13109ecdb03c9ddea93b04215373461cb4999bcd97d3d876c09ec0262b41589819012c11a2f7f51441319278885d0042514394a7
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf
spikblad(118 kB)20 downloads
File information
File name SPIKBLAD01.pdfFile size 118 kBChecksum SHA-512
ede0967dbb3250f02156597300658a435360faf281805b3b3b8d404a51b362a051980a489a046e91eb26712aa39e73f84dd0cb3e84c287774dce27b5b7fefff6
Type spikbladMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Enarsson, Therese
By organisation
Department of Law
Law

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 263 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 5363 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf