umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Business and Community Approaches to Rural Development: Comparing Government-To-Local Approaches
Umeå University. Centre for Regional Science, Umeå University. (Arcum)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9296-1997
School of Environmental Design & Rural Development University of Guelph Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Centre for Families,Work & Well Being University of Guelph Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
2012 (English)In: Journal of Rural and Community Development, ISSN 1712-8277, E-ISSN 1712-8277, Vol. 7, no 2, p. 152-169Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The Canadian Community Futures Program and the European Union program for rural development, LEADER, are similar in their ambitions to boost rural development at community level through state intervention. Each program offers universal coverage, external funding and a set of regulations to be adjusted to local circumstances through local action. Economic development and an increased local capacity to act are important ambitions. When comparing the two programs differences become evident. The Community Futures focus on short term business development through revolving loans, counseling and community projects, whereas LEADER have a mid- to long term perspective in creating development oriented networks through project funding. In evaluating and learning from these programs, this paper argues that mainly core objectives (economic and employment outputs) are measured and accounted for whereas outcomes such as community performance, leadership development, community cohesion, confidence building and youth engagement often are neglected. The latter are of greater importance for the continued pursuit of establishing learning communities.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Brandon University , 2012. Vol. 7, no 2, p. 152-169
Keywords [en]
rural development, community economic development, rural governance, Community Futures, LEADER
National Category
Human Geography
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-98679Local ID: 881251OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-98679DiVA, id: diva2:783506
Available from: 2015-01-26 Created: 2015-01-26 Last updated: 2019-03-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(390 kB)4 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 390 kBChecksum SHA-512
cc306a23eb459ccf817040dacf1ba980e17c5ef0c95e110a6f516b5584511571c48724a264239fe1f9c2fc1cef065a8331d5b282b8d5f6924fd0651d80b1d09e
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

URL

Authority records BETA

Larsson, Lars

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Larsson, Lars
By organisation
Umeå University
In the same journal
Journal of Rural and Community Development
Human Geography

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 4 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 197 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf