Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-6th-edition.csl
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The impact of increased standard flexibility on disclosure practices: a comparison of the introduction of IFRS 8 in the UK, Germany, France and Italy and its impact on companies' segment disclosures
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Umeå School of Business and Economics (USBE), Business Administration.
2015 (English)Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Following a series of reporting scandals in the early 2000s, several researchers studied the gradual shift toward more principles-based accounting systems. There seems to be a general belief that the adoption of international principles-based accounting standards will improve financial reporting quality worldwide, although little evidence is provided for this claim. At the same time several studies claim that heterogeneity in countries’ environmental factors will not lead to harmonized accounting practices and that important differences will remain even though there is common international accounting system.

This study contributes to the literature regarding a shift toward more principles-based standards by investigating the effect of increased requirements’ flexibility on disclosure practices in an international environment characterized by harmonized accounting regulations but heterogeneous disclosure practices. The standards that are used are IFRS 8 Operating segment and its predecessor IAS 14R Segment Reporting. IFRS 8 took effect from January 1 2009. The countries included in the study represent the four largest economies in Europe, namely the UK, Germany, France and Italy.

The methodology used is quantitative and follows a positivistic research approach. This study investigates the impact that a regulatory change has on disclosure practices by observing data reported in the annual reports and asserts the eventual differences between the two standards and across the four countries.

The study provides evidence of only a marginal change in segment disclosure practices after the introduction of IFRS 8. The change is mostly characterized by a loss of key information indicating that more flexible requirements negatively impact accounting practices. This implies that if the purpose of a regulatory change is to assure a certain level of information, more rigid requirements are to be preferred. Further, this study shows that, opposed to expectations; disclosure practices are more heterogeneous under more rules-based standards. However, there is indication that the reason for increased homogeneity is that companies listed in the UK and Germany, presenting a higher amount of segment information under IAS 14R, have decreased the information under IFRS 8. It seems thus that standard enforceability decreases under more flexible disclosure requirements.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå: Umeå Universitet , 2015. , p. 203
Series
Studier i företagsekonomi. Serie B, ISSN 0346-8291 ; 89
Keywords [en]
IFRS, IFRS 8, segment reporting, principles-based standards, standard flexibility, disclosure practices, harmonization, cross-country comparison
National Category
Business Administration
Research subject
Business Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-110694ISBN: 978-91-7601-371-7 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-110694DiVA, id: diva2:864276
Public defence
2015-11-20, Triple Helix, Samverkanshuset, Umeå universitet, Umeå, 13:15 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2015-10-30 Created: 2015-10-26 Last updated: 2018-06-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

The impact of increased standard flexibility on disclosure practices(7928 kB)4769 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 7928 kBChecksum SHA-512
bd1a9dc81d033ff4a02c0f1f335fca5eda147ec17eb626cecd1b7f262d1d1e936c77da642d29ac4249d925f778bf8857e985b8eeca38495e3fed4d2006a1fef8
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf
spikblad(161 kB)78 downloads
File information
File name SPIKBLAD01.pdfFile size 161 kBChecksum SHA-512
a03ea3267bd64f469ccb593136f0812304891d10126bcb69f18fefef37bc2d84a3eb8276c7957c339cb96d79d4bb5754e764e0df77adad3b079cbdac48daf60a
Type spikbladMimetype application/pdf

Authority records

Giunti, Giulia

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Giunti, Giulia
By organisation
Business Administration
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 4773 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 2396 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-6th-edition.csl
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf