umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The significance of ethical disagreement for theories of ethical thought and talk
Stockholm University.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3112-0673
2017 (English)In: The Routledge handbook of metaethics / [ed] Tristram McPherson and David Plunkett, New York: Routledge, 2017, p. 275-291Chapter in book (Refereed)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
New York: Routledge, 2017. p. 275-291
Series
Routledge handbooks in philosophy
National Category
Philosophy Ethics
Research subject
Practical Philosophy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-129359ISBN: 9781138812208 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-129359DiVA: diva2:1059442
Available from: 2016-12-22 Created: 2016-12-22 Last updated: 2017-11-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Björnsson, Gunnar
PhilosophyEthics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 81 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf