umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Vad, hur och varför i slöjdämnet: textillärares uppfattningar om innehåll och undervisning i relation till kursplanen
Umeå University, Faculty of Arts, Department of Creative Studies (Teacher Education).
2017 (Swedish)Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)Alternative title
What, how and why in the school subject sloyd : textiles teachers' perceptions of the content and teaching in relation to curriculum (English)
Abstract [en]

The thesis deals with questions of how the purpose and content in the Swedish school subject Sloyd can be understood in the present, some years after a new curriculum came into effect in 2011. Through sloyd teachers’ stories of their knowledge and the historical traces that have left a mark on their teaching, such as older syllabuses and mediated experiences, the intention is to examine the pedagogical thinking that forms the classroom’s activities. The overall purpose is to develop knowledge of what shapes the design of sloyd, based on how the subject is expressed in the syllabus and in teachers' understandings of teaching and the subject. Based on previous knowledge and interviews, a hermeneutic research process has been designed and developed over time. Seventeen semi-structured interviews with textiles teachers where conducted, recorded and transcribed for the study. The hermeneutic interpretation process involved repeatedly reading and listening, and the material was coded using the digital analysis tool ATLAS.ti. Through repeated reading of the codes, three overarching themes were found: Textiles teachers' perceptions of Sloyd’s purpose and content, Textiles teachers’ teaching, and Manual and intellectual work in unity. The perspective of curriculum theory using a frame factor model is intended to highlight how Sloyd manifests itself at different levels of interpretation, which may impact how sloyd takes shape in the classroom. For a functional perspective on the study's data, didactic theory is used with a focus on subject didactics. The transformation phase is central to the shaping of Sloyd, where teachers’ beliefs and perceptions about the subject will influence their interpretation of the syllabus. Shulman's model of pedagogical thinking and action linked to pedagogical content knowledge, PCK, form the basis for the analysis together with theoretical perspectives on teachers’ pedagogical thinking as Kansanen and Hansén describes it. In summary, two levels of pedagogical thinking are distinguished by analysis. Firstly, based on those teachers who transform and implement teaching in sloyd based on an interpretation that follows the syllabus closely, and secondly, based on those who proceed from an interpretation that is closer to sloyd’s field of knowledge, based on handicraft. This results in two subject conceptions relating to sloyd. Teachers can ascribe to one of these, or move between them in the different phases of pedagogical planning and reflection. The conclusions also include an understanding of why the knowledge requirements in the syllabus largely relate to the students expressing themselves in words regarding their learning and their choices during the process. The curriculum is results-oriented and the knowledge that is evaluated must therefore be measurable and comparable, and be made possible to learn through the subject content. It can also be interpreted as an approximation of a practical knowledge culture to a theoretical knowledge culture, and therefore a legitimation of a practical subject in the school context that elementary school constitutes.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå: Umeå universitet , 2017. , 225 p.
Series
Doktorsavhandlingar i pedagogiskt arbete, ISSN 1650-8858 ; 74
Keyword [en]
Teachers pedagogical thinking, teaching, PCK, knowledge requirements, craft education, interviews
Keyword [sv]
textilslöjd, slöjdundervisning, Lgr11, kunskapskrav, kunskapsområdet slöjd, didaktiskt tänkande, didaktisk innehållskunskap, intervjuer
National Category
Pedagogical Work
Research subject
educational work
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-130419ISBN: 978-91-7601-638-1 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-130419DiVA: diva2:1070235
Public defence
2017-02-24, Hörsal E, Humanisthuset, Umeå universitet, Umeå, 13:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2017-02-03 Created: 2017-01-19 Last updated: 2017-02-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(4195 kB)1572 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 4195 kBChecksum SHA-512
258f487a5aca0894c0bb7252cf64452bcfd7927681a91269b875d9e015a71215c78a8fdc213a8c94b78a4456987c287390a4b46361ab699e6a3c1ea87f44f648
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf
spikblad(69 kB)8 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 69 kBChecksum SHA-512
101df798fab354b087e70419cd215c5e562d2ca49c9f95af229f922cb97537494129f13de3f12149d7490616ac86a2a8c056748c2e7d3be8732d4a3b2a012ad2
Type spikbladMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Jeansson, Åsa
By organisation
Department of Creative Studies (Teacher Education)
Pedagogical Work

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 1580 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 572 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf