umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Shocks to fish production: Identification, trends, and consequences
Show others and affiliations
2017 (English)In: Global Environmental Change, ISSN 0959-3780, E-ISSN 1872-9495, Vol. 42, 24-32 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Sudden disruptions, or shocks, to food production can adversely impact access to and trade of food commodities. Seafood is the most traded food commodity and is globally important to human nutrition. The seafood production and trade system is exposed to a variety of disruptions including fishery collapses, natural disasters, oil spills, policy changes, and aquaculture disease outbreaks, aquafeed resource access and price spikes. The patterns and trends of these shocks to fisheries and aquaculture are poorly characterized and this limits the ability to generalize or predict responses to political, economic, and environmental changes. We applied a statistical shock detection approach to historic fisheries and aquaculture data to identify shocks over the period 1976–2011. A complementary case study approach was used to identify possible key social and political dynamics related to these shocks. The lack of a trend in the frequency or magnitude of the identified shocks and the range of identified causes suggest shocks are a common feature of these systems which occur due to a variety, and often multiple and simultaneous, causes. Shocks occurred most frequently in the Caribbean and Central America, the Middle East and North Africa, and South America, while the largest magnitude shocks occurred in Asia, Europe, and Africa. Shocks also occurred more frequently in aquaculture systems than in capture systems, particularly in recent years. In response to shocks, countries tend to increase imports and experience decreases in supply. The specific combination of changes in trade and supply are context specific, which is highlighted through four case studies. Historical examples of shocks considered in this study can inform policy for responding to shocks and identify potential risks and opportunities to build resilience in the global food system.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017. Vol. 42, 24-32 p.
Keyword [en]
Fisheries, Food security, Food system, Resilience, Shocks, Trade
National Category
Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-132511DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.11.003ISI: 000394634500003OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-132511DiVA: diva2:1082018
Available from: 2017-03-15 Created: 2017-03-15 Last updated: 2017-11-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2342 kB)31 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2342 kBChecksum SHA-512
066320cbe7f11907d3eae226ff71b78348b8f781248bca1176a49e672081520371ef4e35fb3f040521b483557b89532025ef683b10637018158fe23cc782a73b
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Seekell, David
By organisation
Department of Ecology and Environmental SciencesArctic Research Centre at Umeå University
In the same journal
Global Environmental Change
Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 31 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 115 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf