umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of UBC(®) Rapid in bladder cancer: a Swedish multicentre study
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology. Sundsvall Hospital.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology. Sundsvall Hospital.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology.
Show others and affiliations
2017 (English)In: Scandinavian journal of urology, ISSN 2168-1805, E-ISSN 2168-1813, Vol. 51, no 4, 293-300 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of UBC(®) Rapid - a urine-based marker for bladder cancer - in patients with bladder cancer and controls, and to compare the test results across risk groups.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective phase II study was conducted at four Swedish hospitals. UBC Rapid was evaluated in four groups: A, newly diagnosed bladder cancer (n = 94); B, follow-up of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (n = 75); C, benign urinary tract diseases (n = 51); and D, healthy controls (n = 50). Tumours were divided into high risk (carcinoma in situ, TaG3, T1, T2 and T3) and low risk (low malignant potential, TaG1 and TaG2). Urine samples were quantitatively analysed by UBC Rapid. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated based on optimal cut-off (receiver operator characteristics curve analysis). A linear regression compared the UBC Rapid results in the different risk groups.

RESULTS: The optimal cut-off was 8.1 μg/l. The median UBC Rapid values were 9.3 μg/l [interquartile range (IQR) 30.9] and 4.3 μg/l (IQR 7.8) in patients with positive and negative cystoscopy, respectively (p < .001). The value for group A was 15.6 μg/l (IQR 37.9), group B 5.6 μg/l (IQR 8.6), group C 5.1 μg/l (IQR 9.0) and group D 3.3 μg/l (IQR 7.1). Sensitivity was 70.8%, specificity 61.4%, PPV 71.3% and NPV 60.8%. The high-risk group had significantly higher UBC Rapid values than the low-risk group: 20.5 μg/l (IQR 42.2), sensitivity 79.2% and specificity 61.4% versus 7.0 μg/l (IQR 9.9), sensitivity 60.0% and specificity 61.4% (p = .039).

CONCLUSIONS: The UBC Rapid urine-based marker for bladder cancer gave higher values in patients with positive than in those with negative cystoscopy. The diagnostic accuracy was better in patients with high-risk than in those with low-risk tumours, and was better during primary detection than during surveillance.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017. Vol. 51, no 4, 293-300 p.
Keyword [en]
Disease monitoring, UBC® Rapid point-of-care systems, primary disease, urinary bladder cancer
National Category
Urology and Nephrology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-133970DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2017.1313309ISI: 000405483400011PubMedID: 28422550OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-133970DiVA: diva2:1090250
Available from: 2017-04-24 Created: 2017-04-24 Last updated: 2017-08-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Styrke, JohanHenriksson, HeleneLjungberg, BörjeSherif, Amir
By organisation
Urology and Andrology
In the same journal
Scandinavian journal of urology
Urology and Nephrology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 34 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf