umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Risk factors for injuries associated with damage claims following groin hernia repair
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine.
Show others and affiliations
2017 (English)In: Hernia, ISSN 1265-4906, E-ISSN 1248-9204, Vol. 21, no 2, 215-221 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Surgical repair of groin hernia should be carried out with minimal complication rates, and it is important to have regular quality control and accurate means of assessment. The Swedish healthcare system has a mutual insurance company (LA-F) that receives claims from patients who have suffered healthcare-related damage or malpractice. The Swedish Hernia Register (SHR) currently covers around 98% of all Swedish groin hernia operations. The aim of this study was to analyse damage claims following groin hernia repair surgery and link these with entries in the SHR, in order to identify risk factors and causes of injuries and malpractice associated with hernia repair. Data on all 48,574 groin hernia operations registered in the SHR between 2008 and 2010 were compared and linked with data on claims made to the Swedish National Patient Injury Insurance (LA-F). Of the 130 damage claims received by LA-F, 26 dealt with bleeding, 20 with testicular injury and 7 with intestinal lesions. Eighty (62%) of the complications were considered malpractice according to the Swedish Patient Injury Act. Acute and recurrent surgery, sutured repair and general anaesthesia were associated with a significantly increased risk for a damage claim independently the patients were compensated or not. Females filed claims in greater proportion than males. There was no significant difference in background factors between claims accepted by LA-F and compensated and those who were rejected compensation. Risk factors for filing a damage claim included acute surgery, operation for recurrence, sutured repair and general anaesthesia, whereas local anaesthesia reduced the risk.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
SPRINGER , 2017. Vol. 21, no 2, 215-221 p.
Keyword [en]
Groin hernia repair, Damage claims, Malpractice
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-134823DOI: 10.1007/s10029-017-1585-zISI: 000398700900008PubMedID: 28181088OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-134823DiVA: diva2:1098339
Available from: 2017-05-24 Created: 2017-05-24 Last updated: 2017-05-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(401 kB)20 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 401 kBChecksum SHA-512
15ef956ba726a1abdbad999d692b889810b6f91ff7c58cc8086b8bdc6d21da8b036a8802a0b48ae339e86d1deea888737406ac63a92333e879e837c5172b2c71
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nordin, PärHolmberg, Henrik
By organisation
SurgeryDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine
In the same journal
Hernia
Surgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 20 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 15 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf