umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Effects of Low-Load Motor Control Exercises and a High-Load Lifting Exercise on Lumbar Multifidus Thickness - A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Orthopaedics.
Luleå Tekniska Universitet, Institutionen för hälsovetenskap, Avdelningen för hälsa och rehabilitering, Fysioterapi .
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy.
2016 (English)In: Spine, ISSN 0362-2436, E-ISSN 1528-1159, Vol. [Epub ahead of print]Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of low-load motor control exercises and a high-load lifting exercise, on lumbar multifidus (LM) thickness on either side of the spine and whether the effects are affected by pain intensity or change in pain intensity, among patients with nociceptive mechanical LBP.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is evidence that patients with low back pain may have a decreased size of the (LM) muscles with an asymmetry between sides in the lower back. It has also been shown that low-load motor control training can affect this asymmetry. It is, however, not known whether a high-load exercise has the same effect.

METHODS: Sixty-five participants diagnosed with nociceptive mechanical low back painwere included and randomized into low-load motor control exercises or a high-load lifting exercise, the deadlift. The LM thickness was measured using rehabilitative ultrasound imaging, at baseline and after a 2-month training period.

RESULTS: There were no differences between interventions regarding effect on LM muscle thickness. However, the analysis showed a significant effect for asymmetry. The thickness of the LMmuscle on the small side increased significantly compared to the large side in both intervention groups, without influence of pain at baseline, or change in pain intensity.

CONCLUSIONS: There was a difference in thickness of the LM muscles between sides. It seems that exercises focusing on spinal alignment may increase the thickness of the LM muscles on the small side, irrespective of exercise load. The increase in LM thickness does not appear to be mediated by either current pain intensity or the magnitude of change in pain intensity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. [Epub ahead of print]
National Category
Physiotherapy
Research subject
physiotherapy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-135618DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001989OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-135618DiVA: diva2:1104305
Available from: 2017-05-31 Created: 2017-05-31 Last updated: 2017-05-31

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full texthttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27870804

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Berglund, LarsAasa, Ulrika
By organisation
PhysiotherapyOrthopaedics
In the same journal
Spine
Physiotherapy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 68 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf