umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
On the performance of four methods for the numerical solution of ecologically realistic size-structured population models
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics.
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics. Evolution and Ecology Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria.
2017 (English)In: Methods in Ecology and Evolution, ISSN 2041-210X, E-ISSN 2041-210X, Vol. 8, no 8, 948-956 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

1. Size-structured population models (SSPMs) are widely used in ecology to account for intraspecific variation in body size. Three characteristic features of size-structured populations are the dependence of life histories on the entire size distribution, intrinsic population renewal through the birth of new individuals, and the potential accumulation of individuals with similar body sizes due to determinate or stunted growth. Because of these three features, numerical methods that work well for structurally similar transport equations may fail for SSPMs and other transport-dominated models with high ecological realism, and thus their computational performance needs to be critically evaluated.

2. Here, we compare the performance of four numerical solution schemes, the fixed-mesh upwind (FMU) method, the moving-mesh upwind (MMU) method, the characteristic method (CM), and the Escalator Boxcar Train (EBT) method, in numerically solving three reference problems that are representative of ecological systems in the animal and plant kingdoms. The MMU method is here applied for the first time to SSPMs, whereas the three other methods have been employed by other authors.

3. Our results show that the EBT method performs best, except for one of the three reference problems, in which size-asymmetric competition affects individual growth rates. For that reference problem, the FMU method performs best, closely followed by the MMU method. Surprisingly, the CM method does not perform well for any of the three reference problems.

4. We conclude that life-history features should be carefully considered when choosing the numerical method for analyzing ecologically realistic size-structured population models.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017. Vol. 8, no 8, 948-956 p.
Keyword [en]
asymmetric competition, characteristic curve, Escalator Boxcar Train, life history, moving mesh, size-structured population, upwind scheme
National Category
Computational Mathematics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-138680DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12741ISI: 000406916200006OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-138680DiVA: diva2:1137020
Available from: 2017-08-30 Created: 2017-08-30 Last updated: 2017-09-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Zhang, LaiBrännström, Åke
By organisation
Department of Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics
In the same journal
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Computational Mathematics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 9 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf