umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Self-rated health, generalized trust, and the Affordable Care Act: A US panel study, 2006–2014
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Sociology.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4974-2956
2017 (English)In: Social Science and Medicine, ISSN 0277-9536, E-ISSN 1873-5347, Vol. 190C, 48-56 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Previous research shows that generalized trust, the belief that most people can be trusted, is conducive to people's health. However, only recently have longitudinal studies suggested an additional reciprocal pathway from health back to trust. Drawing on a diverse body of literature that shows how egalitarian social policy contributes to the promotion of generalized trust, we hypothesize that this other ‘reverse’ pathway could be sensitive to health insurance context. Drawing on nationally representative US panel data from the General Social Survey, we examine whether the Affordable Care Act of 2010 could have had influence on the deteriorating impact of worsening self-rated health (SRH) on generalized trust. Firstly, using two-wave panel data (2008–2010, N = 1403) and employing random effects regression models, we show that a lack of health insurance coverage negatively determines generalized trust in the United States. However, this association is attenuated when additionally controlling for (perceived) income inequality. Secondly, utilizing data from two separate three-wave panel studies from the US General Social Survey (2006–10; N = 1652; 2010–2014; N = 1187), we employ fixed-effects linear regression analyses to control for unobserved heterogeneity from time-invariant factors. We demonstrate that worsening SRH was a stronger predictor for a decrease in generalized trust prior (2006–2010) to the implementation of the Affordable Care Act. Further, the negative effect of fair/poor SRH seen in the 2006–2010 data becomes attenuated in the 2010–2014 panel data. We thus find evidence for a substantial weakening of the previously established negative impact of decreasing SRH on generalized trust, coinciding with the most significant US healthcare reforms in decades. Social policy and healthcare policy implications are discussed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017. Vol. 190C, 48-56 p.
Keyword [en]
Health insurance; Healthcare reform; Income inequality; Longitudinal; Self-rated health; Social capital; Trust; United States
National Category
Sociology (excluding Social Work, Social Psychology and Social Anthropology) Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-138804DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.08.012OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-138804DiVA: diva2:1137477
Projects
Three Worlds of Trust: A Longitudinal Study of Welfare States, Life-Course Risks, and Social Trust
Funder
Riksbankens Jubileumsfond, NHS14-2035:1
Available from: 2017-08-31 Created: 2017-08-31 Last updated: 2017-08-31

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full texthttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953617304847?via%3Dihub

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Mewes, JanGiordano, Giuseppe Nicola
By organisation
Department of Sociology
In the same journal
Social Science and Medicine
Sociology (excluding Social Work, Social Psychology and Social Anthropology)Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 25 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf