umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Policy and practice in Swedish education, assessment, and school leadership
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of applied educational science, Departement of Educational Measurement.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4625-4853
2012 (English)In: School leadership in the context of standards-based reform / [ed] Volante, Louis, New York: Springer, 2012, p. 147-172Chapter in book (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

In recent years, the Swedish school system has been subject to a number of reforms. These reforms have mainly been focused on decentralization and educational goals and have resulted in many changes for the schools and people in the system. Among other things, the responsibility for schools was moved from the state to municipalities. The “free school reform” and the introduction of a voucher system put the schools in the market and introduced competition on many levels. National steering documents would ensure common goals and comparability in terms of educational content. The idea was to give the professionals within the system, i.e., school leaders and teachers, the freedom to decide how to reach the goals, while using the open market to “weed out” unsuccessful schools.

The Swedish system which used to be one of the most centralized and regulated systems in the world, is today one of the most decentralized and deregulated, characterized by competition on many levels and an increasing focus on results. This has put pressure on the schools to show good results, which, in turn, has led to a number of consequences for all stakeholders. This chapter describes the Swedish goal-referenced school system through the perspective of educational accountability and looks at how the reforms and the increased focus on results have affected school leaders and teachers. Validity issues related to the current accountability model and the performance measures are also discussed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
New York: Springer, 2012. p. 147-172
Series
Studies of educational leadership ; 16
Keywords [en]
school leadership, assessment, measurement, testing, accountability, Goal Attainment, National Curriculum, School Leader, National Test, Accountability System
National Category
Educational Sciences
Research subject
education
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-141417ISBN: 978-94-007-4094-5 (print)ISBN: 978-94-007-4095-2 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-141417DiVA, id: diva2:1154417
Available from: 2017-11-02 Created: 2017-11-02 Last updated: 2019-05-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records BETA

Wikström, Christina

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wikström, Christina
By organisation
Departement of Educational Measurement
Educational Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 69 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf