umu.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The worst performance rule with elderly in abnormal cognitive decline
Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Sweden.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-1473-4916
Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institute, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institute, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.
Umeå universitet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Institutionen för psykologi.ORCID-id: 0000-0001-5366-1169
2017 (Engelska)Ingår i: Intelligence, ISSN 0160-2896, E-ISSN 1873-7935, Vol. 64, s. 9-17Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

Compared to best performances, worst performances on multi-trial psychometric tests often show stronger correlations with other g-loaded cognitive tests, which is known as the Worst Performance Rule (WPR). While worst performances may be more sensitive or specific to cognitive decline, clinical psychometric research and neuropsychological practice tends to neglect the WPR. Here, we examined the WPR-paradigm relative to abnormal cognitive decline. Specifically, we studied the WPR with binned simple reaction time task responses when rank-correlated with five different estimates of psychometric g within a memory clinic sample (n = 103) of elderly diagnosed with either Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) (n = 53) or dementia (n = 50). Three of the g-estimates were composite scores constructed from 2, 6, and 28 established test scores. Results showed a consistent WPR-pattern in the whole sample for each of the five estimates (block design rs = − 0.201 to − 0.120; digit span rs = − 0.284 to − 0.112; g2 rs = − 0.311 to − 0.162; g6 rs = − 0.314 to − 0.107; g28 rs = − 0.269 to − 0.121). Our findings contradict classical test theory, and highlight the underused potential of the WPR when assessing cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Elsevier, 2017. Vol. 64, s. 9-17
Nyckelord [en]
Aging, General intelligence, Mental chronometry, Neurodegeneration
Nationell ämneskategori
Psykologi (exklusive tillämpad psykologi)
Forskningsämne
psykologi
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-141418DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2017.06.003ISI: 000412265300002OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-141418DiVA, id: diva2:1154426
Tillgänglig från: 2017-11-02 Skapad: 2017-11-02 Senast uppdaterad: 2018-06-09Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltext

Personposter BETA

Wallert, JohnMadison, Guy

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Wallert, JohnMadison, Guy
Av organisationen
Institutionen för psykologi
I samma tidskrift
Intelligence
Psykologi (exklusive tillämpad psykologi)

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 85 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf