umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Tre myter om mirakel: reflektioner kring övernaturliga förklaringar och historisk metod utifrån boken Den okände Jesus
Umeå University, Faculty of Arts, Department of historical, philosophical and religious studies.
2017 (Swedish)In: Svensk teologisk kvartalskrift, ISSN 0039-6761, no 3-4, p. 191-208Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Some New Testament scholars argue that as historians, they must reject all miracle reports a priori. When asked to justify this view, the scholars usually appeal to some of the following philosophical claims:

1) Miracles are incompatible with our natural scientific knowledge.

2) Even though miracles are theoretically possible, we can never be rationally justified in believing that a reported miracle actually happened (Hume’s argument).

3) Miracles entail the existence of a supernatural realm, and the supernatural (God) cannot be the object of scientific or scholarly knowledge or study.

I argue that there are no good reasons to believe any of these claims, which should be regarded as “myths”. The first claim confuses science with a controversial philosophical theory – naturalism. The second claim is undermined by the devastating philosophical criticism that has been directed at Hume’s anti-miracle argument. The third claim entails that philosophers of religion who debate theistic arguments are wasting their time, since no theistic argument can ever succeed. It is very unclear, however, how anybody could possibly know that no theistic argument can ever succeed.

All three myths are exemplified in a recent book by Cecilia Wassén and Tobias Hägerland: Den okände Jesus: Berättelsen om en profet som misslyckades (The Unknown Jesus: The Story of a Prophet Who Failed). Taking this work as my point of departure, I discuss the myths with reference to a wider horizon of Swedish and international Jesus research. I also suggest a more reasonable framework for dealing with miracle reports in the context of historical scholarship.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Lund, 2017. no 3-4, p. 191-208
Keywords [sv]
Mirakelrapporter, historievetenskaplig metod, nytestamentlig exegetik, metodologisk naturalism, David Hume, vetenskap och tro
National Category
Philosophy, Ethics and Religion
Research subject
Studies In Faiths and Ideologies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-145878OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-145878DiVA, id: diva2:1191777
Available from: 2018-03-20 Created: 2018-03-20 Last updated: 2018-10-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

URL

Authority records BETA

Wahlberg, Mats

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wahlberg, Mats
By organisation
Department of historical, philosophical and religious studies
In the same journal
Svensk teologisk kvartalskrift
Philosophy, Ethics and Religion

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 140 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf